Regulating Magic: Why We Need to Establish a Regulatory Framework for Quantum Computing and Artificial Intelligence

The promises of quantum computing, artificial intelligence, and other advancing technologies sound like magic. However, even magic is subject to the laws of economics. And even quantum computers are "legal things…technological tools that are bound to affect our lives in a tangible manner," as Valentin Jeutner explains in The Quantum Imperative: Addressing the Legal Dimension of Quantum Computers. Analogous to Asimov's Three Laws of Robotics, Professor Jeutner proposes a three-part "quantum imperative," which "provides that regulators and developers must ensure that the development of quantum computers: 1. does not create or exacerbate inequalities, 2. does not undermine individual autonomy, 3. does not occur without consulting those whose interests they affect." Should regulators seek to apply these principles?