Responsibility and Blame: A Structural-Model Approach
–Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Causality is typically treated an all-or-nothing concept; either A is a cause of B or it is not. We extend the definition of causality introduced by Halpern and Pearl (2004a) to take into account the degree of responsibility of A for B. For example, if someone wins an election 11-0, then each person who votes for him is less responsible for the victory than if he had won 6-5. We then define a notion of degree of blame, which takes into account an agent's epistemic state. Roughly speaking, the degree of blame of A for B is the expected degree of responsibility of A for B, taken over the epistemic state of an agent.
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Oct-1-2004
- Country:
- North America > United States
- New York > Tompkins County
- Ithaca (0.04)
- Massachusetts > Middlesex County
- Cambridge (0.04)
- New York > Tompkins County
- Europe > United Kingdom
- England
- Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.14)
- Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- England
- Asia
- Middle East > Israel
- Jerusalem District > Jerusalem (0.04)
- Japan
- Kyūshū & Okinawa > Kyūshū
- Nagasaki Prefecture > Nagasaki (0.04)
- Honshū > Chūgoku
- Hiroshima Prefecture > Hiroshima (0.04)
- Kyūshū & Okinawa > Kyūshū
- Middle East > Israel
- North America > United States
- Industry:
- Law (1.00)
- Technology: