The AI's Half-Century

"How We Know Universals: The Perception Their first paper made many intellectual waves--which are still spreading, 50 years later. They had claimed that the truth or falsity of any (computable) proposition could, in with AI, for it's difficult to say just principle, be computed by a simple type of The future of psychology, they good a date as any, however, is 1943--almost said, consisted of the design of various sorts exactly half a century ago. This In that year, Warren McCulloch (a psychiatrist, novel methodology, and the nascent technology cybernetician, philosopher, and poet) associated with it, promised to show just and Walter Pitts (a research student in mathematics) how mind is grounded in mechanism. Much of this was "logical" in nature result was a heady brew, which explicitly and developed into what's known as classical, promised to revolutionize psychology and or symbolic, AI. But some was what is nowadays philosophy--and which, in the event, revolutionized called connectionist, studying networks technology too. In the late 1980s, however, it McCulloch and Pitts' paper ("A Logical Calculus blossomed--hitting the newsstands with of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous rash promises of "brainlike" computers just Activity") concentrated on how propositions around the corner. But both these forms of AI expressible in logic could be computed by share the same historical roots. Those nets consisted of So much for pedigree. But does a mere halfcentury cells passing inhibitory and excitatory messages of work count as a pedigree? Might it between them and acting as what computer rather be a mere blip, an unfortunate academic scientists (soon afterwards) called "and-mutation with no real intellectual fitness?