Comparison of Human and Machine Word Recognition

We present a study which is concerned with word recognition rates for heavily degraded documents. We compare human with machine reading capabilities in a series of experiments, which explores the interaction of word/non-word recognition, word frequency and legality of non-words with degradation level. We also study the influence of character segmentation, and compare human performance with that of our artificial neural network model for reading. We found that the proposed computer model uses word context as efficiently as humans, but performs slightly worse on the pure character recognition task. 1 Introduction Optical Character Recognition (OCR) of machine-print document images ·has matured considerably during the last decade. Recognition rates as high as 99.5% have been reported on good quality documents. However, for lower image resolutions (200 Dpl and below), noisy images, images with blur or skew, the recognition rate declines considerably. In bad quality documents, character segmentation is as big a problem as the actual character recognition.