Supplementary material for " Improving neural network representations using human similarity judgments " Anonymous Author(s) Affiliation Address email A Experimental details 1 A.1 Model features 2

Figure A.1: Among all hyperparameter combinations considered in our grid search, a combination of ( We used a compute time of approximately 5600 CPU-hours of 2.90GHz Intel Xeon Gold In this section, we outline our anomaly detection experimental setting in more detail. Given a dataset (e.g., CIFAR-10) with In contrast to the "one-vs-rest" setting, in LOO we define one class of the In both "one-vs-rest" and LOO AD settings, we evaluate model representations in the following way: We show the pairs of items that change the most in distance in Table B.1. "stethoscope", which are semantically unrelated but perhaps have some slight visual similarity, tend We show the results in Fig. B.1. Table B.1: Distances between pairs of individual items from THINGS, ranked by the relative change in cosine The top items move much closer together under naive alignment, while the bottom ones move much farther apart. Figure B.1: How does the global structure of the representations change after alignment?