Probabilistic Reasoning with Inconsistent Beliefs Using Inconsistency Measures

The classical probabilistic entailment problem is to We apply the family of minimal violation measures from determine upper and lower bounds on the probability [Potyka, 2014] since they allow us to extend the classical notion of formulas, given a consistent set of probabilistic of models of a probabilistic knowledge base to inconsistent assertions. We generalize this problem ones. Intuitively, the generalized models are those probability by omitting the consistency assumption and, thus, functions that minimally violate the knowledge base provide a general framework for probabilistic reasoning [Potyka and Thimm, 2014]. We incorporate integrity constraints under inconsistency. To do so, we utilize and study a family of generalized entailment problems inconsistency measures to determine probability for probabilistic knowledge bases. More specifically, functions that are closest to satisfying the knowledge the contributions of this work are as follows: base. We illustrate our approach on several 1. We introduce the computational problem of generalized examples and show that it has both nice formal and entailment with integrity constraints in probabilistic logics computational properties.