Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination of Intersectionality in AI Fairness

These notions vary across conceptualization Intersectionality is a critical framework that, through inquiry and (e.g., group, individual fairness [8]) and operationalization (e.g., praxis, allows us to examine how social inequalities persist through pre/in/post-processing [2]) [54]; nevertheless, the literature generally domains of structure and discipline. Given AI fairness' raison d'être agrees on the goal of minimizing negative outcomes across of "fairness," we argue that adopting intersectionality as an analytical demographic groups, including groups associated with multiple, framework is pivotal to effectively operationalizing fairness. "intersectional" demographic attributes (e.g., Black women) [92]. Through a critical review of how intersectionality is discussed in However, Kong [66] observes that AI fairness papers often narrowly 30 papers from the AI fairness literature, we deductively and inductively: interpret intersectional subgroup fairness as intersectionality, the 1) map how intersectionality tenets operate within the critical framework from which the term originates [29, 67]. This AI fairness paradigm and 2) uncover gaps between the conceptualization myopic conceptualization of intersectionality has non-trivial consequences and operationalization of intersectionality. We find that for just AI design and epistemology (i.e., ways of knowing).