Qualitative Belief Conditioning Rules (QBCR)
Smarandache, Florentin, Dezert, Jean
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
In this paper, we propose a simple arithmetic of linguistic labels which allows a direct extension of quantitative Belief Conditioning Rules (BCR) proposed in the DSmT [3, 4] framework to their qualitative counterpart. Qualitative beliefs assignments are well adapted for manipulated information expressed in natural language and usually reported by human expert or AIbased expert systems. A new method for computing directly with words (CW) for combining and conditioning qualitative information is presented. CW, more precisely computing with linguistic labels, is usually more vague, less precise than computing with numbers, but it is expected to offer a better robustness and flexibility for combining uncertain and conflicting human reports than computing with numbers because in most of cases human experts are less efficient to provide (and to justify) precise quantitative beliefs than qualitative beliefs. Before extending the quantitative DSmT-based conditioning rules to their qualitative counterparts, it will be necessary to define few but new important operators on linguistic labels and what is a qualitative belief assignment. Then we will show though simple examples how the combination of qualitative beliefs can be obtained in the DSmT framework.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Sep-4-2007
- Country:
- Europe > France (0.04)
- North America
- Canada > Quebec (0.04)
- United States
- New Jersey > Mercer County
- Princeton (0.04)
- New Mexico > McKinley County
- Gallup (0.14)
- New Jersey > Mercer County
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.40)
- Technology: