On the Adversarial Robustness of 3D Point Cloud Classification
Sun, Jiachen, Koenig, Karl, Cao, Yulong, Chen, Qi Alfred, Mao, Z. Morley
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Though a few defenses against adversarial point cloud classification have been proposed, it remains unknown whether they can provide real robustness. To this end, we perform the first security analysis of state-of-the-art defenses and design adaptive attacks on them. Our 100% adaptive attack success rates demonstrate that current defense designs are still vulnerable. Since adversarial training (AT) is believed to be the most effective defense, we present the first in-depth study showing how AT behaves in point cloud classification and identify that the required symmetric function (pooling operation) is paramount to the model's robustness under AT. Through our systematic analysis, we find that the default used fixed pooling operations (e.g., MAX pooling) generally weaken AT's performance in point cloud classification. Still, sorting-based parametric pooling operations can significantly improve the models' robustness. Based on the above insights, we further propose DeepSym, a deep symmetric pooling operation, to architecturally advance the adversarial robustness under AT to 47.0% without sacrificing nominal accuracy, outperforming the original design and a strong baseline by 28.5% ( 2.6) and 6.5%, respectively, in PointNet. Despite the prominent achievements that deep neural networks (DNN) have reached in the past decade, adversarial attacks (Szegedy et al., 2013) are becoming the Achilles' heel in modern deep learning deployments, where adversaries generate imperceptible perturbations to mislead the DNN models. Numerous attacks have been deployed in various 2D vision tasks, such as classification (Carlini & Wagner, 2017), object detection (Song et al., 2018), and segmentation (Xie et al., 2017). Since adversarial robustness is a critical feature, tremendous efforts have been devoted to defending against 2D adversarial images (Guo et al., 2017; Papernot et al., 2016; Madry et al., 2018).
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Nov-24-2020
- Country:
- North America > United States
- Michigan (0.04)
- Europe > Sweden
- North America > United States
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.64)
- Industry:
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (0.48)
- Technology: