Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Minimal Effort
Wu, Zhenyu, Zeng, Qingkai, Zhang, Zhihan, Tan, Zhaoxuan, Shen, Chao, Jiang, Meng
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Intrinsic self-correct was a method that instructed large language models (LLMs) to verify and correct their responses without external feedback. Unfortunately, the study concluded that the LLMs could not self-correct reasoning yet. We find that a simple yet effective verification method can unleash inherent capabilities of the LLMs. That is to mask a key condition in the question, add the current response to construct a verification question, and predict the condition to verify the response. The condition can be an entity in an open-domain question or a numeric value in a math question, which requires minimal effort (via prompting) to identify. We propose an iterative verify-then-correct framework to progressively identify and correct (probably) false responses, named ProCo. We conduct experiments on three reasoning tasks. On average, ProCo, with GPT-3.5-Turbo as the backend LLM, yields $+6.8$ exact match on four open-domain question answering datasets, $+14.1$ accuracy on three arithmetic reasoning datasets, and $+9.6$ accuracy on a commonsense reasoning dataset, compared to Self-Correct.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jun-23-2024
- Country:
- Asia (1.00)
- North America > United States
- Minnesota > Hennepin County > Minneapolis (0.14)
- Genre:
- Research Report > New Finding (0.87)
- Industry:
- Education > Educational Setting
- K-12 Education (0.47)
- Government (0.93)
- Law (0.94)
- Leisure & Entertainment > Sports (1.00)
- Education > Educational Setting
- Technology: