Dark & Stormy: Modeling Humor in the Worst Sentences Ever Written
Govindarajan, Venkata S, Biester, Laura
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Textual humor is enormously diverse and computational studies need to account for this range, including intentionally bad humor. In this paper, we curate and analyze a novel corpus of sentences from the Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest to better understand "bad" humor in English. Standard humor detection models perform poorly on our corpus, and an analysis of literary devices finds that these sentences combine features common in existing humor datasets (e.g., puns, irony) with metaphor, metafiction and simile. LLMs prompted to synthesize contest-style sentences imitate the form but exaggerate the effect by over-using certain literary devices, and including far more novel adjective-noun bigrams than human writers. Data, code and analysis are available at https://github.com/venkatasg/bulwer-lytton
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Oct-29-2025
- Country:
- Asia
- Europe
- Austria > Vienna (0.14)
- Ireland > Leinster
- County Dublin > Dublin (0.04)
- Portugal > Lisbon
- Lisbon (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- North America
- Canada > Ontario
- Toronto (0.04)
- Mexico > Mexico City
- Mexico City (0.04)
- United States
- Alaska (0.04)
- Louisiana > Orleans Parish
- New Orleans (0.04)
- New York (0.04)
- Canada > Ontario
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.64)
- Technology: