Creative Writing with an AI-Powered Writing Assistant: Perspectives from Professional Writers

Writing complete stories is considered a hallmark display of human intelligence, and thus researchers in artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language generation (NLG) have long used it as a pinnacle task for their research (Klein et al., 1973; Meehan, 1977; Turner, 1993; Dehn, 1981; Liu and Singh, 2002; McIntyre and Lapata, 2009). Creative writing and storytelling present unique challenges for automatic language generation: story arcs extend over thousands of words, stories typically contain multiple characters with their own distinctive personas and voices, and well-written stories have an authorial voice that is consistent and identifiable. At the same time, lies and fabrications-common generation flaws which are a liability in tasks like machine translation and automatic summarization-can be an asset in the creative domain. In recent years, the field of NLG has progressed by leaps and bounds due to the development of neural language models capable of learning the structure of language by ingesting billions of written words (Chowdhery et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022; Brown et al., 2020). There has been considerable work in applying these advancements toward the development of AI-powered tools for creative writing, but nearly all previous research in this space has evaluated their methods either with amateur writers or with crowd workers paid to assess performance on narrowly defined tasks (Clark et al., 2018; Roemmele and Gordon, 2015; Nichols et al., 2020). While these sorts of evaluations are valuable as preliminary assessments, we believe it is also crucial to solicit feedback from actual domain experts in creative writing: professional writers, educators, and language experts. Skilled writers comprise a unique user group with a different set of needs and expectations than amateurs.