Assessing model calibration with boosting trees

In regression modelling, the primary objective is to approximate the true conditional mean of a response given a set of features. To this end, various statistical models are used to fit a regression function that provides a mean estimate for each single set of features. This function is said to be calibrated if the resulting mean estimates match the true conditional means for almost all features. Aiming for calibration seems not achievable in practice as models are fitted on finite samples of noisy observations. A weaker notion of calibration is auto-calibration (sometimes also called mean-calibration or well-calibration); see, for example, Kr uger-Ziegel [22] and Denuit et al. [7]. This notion goes back to earlier works on the reliability of probabilistic forecasts in meteorology; we refer to Bross [2], Sanders [26] and Murphy-Winkler [23]. It means that when responses are grouped according to their mean estimates, the average of the responses within each group matches this estimate. This property is important in various applications where sums of mean estimates have to match sums of responses at a global and local level. This is, for example, the case in insurance pricing as an auto-calibrated pricing system avoids systematic cross-subsidy between different price cohorts; we refer the reader to Pohle [24], Denuit et al. [6], Fissler et al. [9] and W uthrich-Merz [30].