Towards Objective and Unbiased Decision Assessments with LLM-Enhanced Hierarchical Attention Networks

How objective and unbiased are we while making decisions? This work investigates cognitive bias identification in high-stake decision making process by human experts, questioning its effectiveness in real-world settings, such as candidates assessments for university admission. We begin with a statistical analysis assessing correlations among different decision points among in the current process, which discovers discrepancies that imply cognitive bias and inconsistency in decisions. This motivates our exploration of bias-aware AI-augmented workflow that surpass human judgment. We propose BGM-HAN, an enhanced Hierarchical Attention Network with Byte-Pair Encoding, Gated Residual Connections and Multi-Head Attention. Using it as a backbone model, we further propose a Shortlist-Analyse-Recommend (SAR) agentic Figure 1: University Admission Decision Process: overview workflow, which simulate real-world decision-making. In our of current workflow and possible agentic augmentation experiments, both the proposed model and the agentic workflow significantly improves on both human judgment and alternative models, validated with real-world data. Source code is available at: critical to ensure long-term sustainable outcomes and fairness to https://github.com/junhua/bgm-han.