Commonsense Knowledge, Ontology and Ordinary Language
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Over two decades ago a "quite revolution" overwhelmingly replaced knowledgebased approaches in natural language processing (NLP) by quantitative (e.g., statistical, corpus-based, machine learning) methods. Although it is our firm belief that purely quantitative approaches cannot be the only paradigm for NLP, dissatisfaction with purely engineering approaches to the construction of large knowledge bases for NLP are somewhat justified. In this paper we hope to demonstrate that both trends are partly misguided and that the time has come to enrich logical semantics with an ontological structure that reflects our commonsense view of the world and the way we talk about in ordinary language. In this paper it will be demonstrated that assuming such an ontological structure a number of challenges in the semantics of natural language (e.g., metonymy, intensionality, copredication, nominal compounds, etc.) can be properly and uniformly addressed.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Aug-8-2008
- Country:
- North America
- United States
- District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- New York > Tompkins County
- Ithaca (0.04)
- Massachusetts
- Middlesex County > Somerville (0.04)
- Hampshire County > Amherst (0.04)
- Louisiana > Orleans Parish
- New Orleans (0.04)
- Illinois > Cook County
- Chicago (0.04)
- California > Santa Clara County
- Stanford (0.04)
- Canada > Ontario
- National Capital Region > Ottawa (0.04)
- United States
- Europe
- Austria > Vienna (0.04)
- United Kingdom > England
- Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- Netherlands
- South Holland > Dordrecht (0.04)
- North Holland > Amsterdam (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East
- Lebanon > Beirut Governorate > Beirut (0.04)
- North America
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.40)
- Technology: