On Specifying for Trustworthiness
Abeywickrama, Dhaminda B., Bennaceur, Amel, Chance, Greg, Demiris, Yiannis, Kordoni, Anastasia, Levine, Mark, Moffat, Luke, Moreau, Luc, Mousavi, Mohammad Reza, Nuseibeh, Bashar, Ramamoorthy, Subramanian, Ringert, Jan Oliver, Wilson, James, Windsor, Shane, Eder, Kerstin
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
As autonomous systems (AS) increasingly become part of our daily lives, ensuring their trustworthiness is crucial. In order to demonstrate the trustworthiness of an AS, we first need to specify what is required for an AS to be considered trustworthy. This roadmap paper identifies key challenges for specifying for trustworthiness in AS, as identified during the "Specifying for Trustworthiness" workshop held as part of the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Trustworthy Autonomous Systems (TAS) programme. We look across a range of AS domains with consideration of the resilience, trust, functionality, verifiability, security, and governance and regulation of AS and identify some of the key specification challenges in these domains. We then highlight the intellectual challenges that are involved with specifying for trustworthiness in AS that cut across domains and are exacerbated by the inherent uncertainty involved with the environments in which AS need to operate.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Aug-20-2023
- Country:
- Europe > United Kingdom > England (0.14)
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.82)
- Industry:
- Government (0.68)
- Health & Medicine > Diagnostic Medicine
- Imaging (0.46)
- Information Technology (0.68)
- Transportation > Ground
- Road (0.46)
- Technology:
- Information Technology
- Artificial Intelligence
- Applied AI (0.93)
- Cognitive Science (0.93)
- Machine Learning (1.00)
- Representation & Reasoning > Agents (1.00)
- Robots > Autonomous Vehicles (0.94)
- Human Computer Interaction (1.00)
- Artificial Intelligence
- Information Technology