Segmenting Text and Learning Their Rewards for Improved RLHF in Language Model

Yin, Yueqin, Yang, Shentao, Xie, Yujia, Yang, Ziyi, Sun, Yuting, Awadalla, Hany, Chen, Weizhu, Zhou, Mingyuan

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence 

To align language models (LMs, e.g., OpenAI, 2023; Reid et al., 2024) with human values, reinforcement learning (RL, Sutton and Barto, 2018) methods have been widely adopted to optimize the non-differentiable human preference, leading to the paradigm of reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF, Ouyang et al., 2022; Bai et al., 2022b). A prevailing approach in RLHF is to optimize the LMs by proximal policy optimization (PPO, Schulman et al., 2017) against a bandit reward model learned from human preference data, with KL regularization towards a pre-specified target distribution to avoid over-optimization on the reward model (Ziegler et al., 2019; Stiennon et al., 2020; Castricato et al., 2022). While this bandit approach is easier for reward modeling and has achieved remarkable success, language generation is intrinsically sequential, rather than simultaneous. Thus, from the view of optimizing human preference, assigning a bandit reward to entire text sequence induces the sparse reward (delayed feedback) issue (Andrychowicz et al., 2017; Marbach and Tsitsiklis, 2003), that often hurts RL-based LM training by increasing gradient variance and lowering sample efficiency (Takanobu et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2020; Guo et al., 2022; Snell et al., 2022).

Duplicate Docs Excel Report

Title
None found

Similar Docs  Excel Report  more

TitleSimilaritySource
None found