Low-Stabilizer-Complexity Quantum States Are Not Pseudorandom
Grewal, Sabee, Iyer, Vishnu, Kretschmer, William, Liang, Daniel
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
We show that quantum states with "low stabilizer complexity" can be efficiently distinguished from Haar-random. Specifically, given an $n$-qubit pure state $|\psi\rangle$, we give an efficient algorithm that distinguishes whether $|\psi\rangle$ is (i) Haar-random or (ii) a state with stabilizer fidelity at least $\frac{1}{k}$ (i.e., has fidelity at least $\frac{1}{k}$ with some stabilizer state), promised that one of these is the case. With black-box access to $|\psi\rangle$, our algorithm uses $O\!\left( k^{12} \log(1/\delta)\right)$ copies of $|\psi\rangle$ and $O\!\left(n k^{12} \log(1/\delta)\right)$ time to succeed with probability at least $1-\delta$, and, with access to a state preparation unitary for $|\psi\rangle$ (and its inverse), $O\!\left( k^{3} \log(1/\delta)\right)$ queries and $O\!\left(n k^{3} \log(1/\delta)\right)$ time suffice. As a corollary, we prove that $\omega(\log(n))$ $T$-gates are necessary for any Clifford+$T$ circuit to prepare computationally pseudorandom quantum states, a first-of-its-kind lower bound.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Sep-28-2022
- Country:
- North America > United States
- Texas > Travis County > Austin (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom
- England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.50)
- Industry:
- Government > Regional Government (0.46)
- Technology: