Survey on Models and Techniques for Root-Cause Analysis
Solé, Marc, Muntés-Mulero, Victor, Rana, Annie Ibrahim, Estrada, Giovani
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Automation and computer intelligence to support complex human decisions becomes essential to manage large and distributed systems in the Cloud and IoT era. Understanding the root cause of an observed symptom in a complex system has been a major problem for decades. As industry dives into the IoT world and the amount of data generated per year grows at an amazing speed, an important question is how to find appropriate mechanisms to determine root causes that can handle huge amounts of data or may provide valuable feedback in real-time. While many survey papers aim at summarizing the landscape of techniques for modelling system behavior and infering the root cause of a problem based in the resulting models, none of those focuses on analyzing how the different techniques in the literature fit growing requirements in terms of performance and scalability. In this survey, we provide a review of root-cause analysis, focusing on these particular aspects. We also provide guidance to choose the best root-cause analysis strategy depending on the requirements of a particular system and application.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Jul-3-2017
- Country:
- Asia > Middle East
- Jordan (0.04)
- Europe
- Finland > Uusimaa
- Helsinki (0.04)
- France (0.04)
- Netherlands
- North Brabant > Eindhoven (0.04)
- North Holland > Amsterdam (0.04)
- South Holland > Dordrecht (0.04)
- Spain
- Castilla-La Mancha > Albacete Province
- Albacete (0.04)
- Catalonia > Barcelona Province
- Barcelona (0.04)
- Castilla-La Mancha > Albacete Province
- United Kingdom > England
- Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Greater London > London (0.04)
- Finland > Uusimaa
- North America
- Canada > Quebec
- Capitale-Nationale Region
- Quebec City (0.04)
- Québec (0.04)
- Montreal (0.04)
- Capitale-Nationale Region
- United States
- New York > New York County
- New York City (0.05)
- California
- Alameda County > Berkeley (0.04)
- Los Angeles County > Pasadena (0.04)
- San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.15)
- San Mateo County > Menlo Park (0.04)
- Massachusetts
- Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- Suffolk County > Boston (0.14)
- District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- Washington > King County
- Seattle (0.04)
- Georgia > Fulton County
- Atlanta (0.04)
- Oregon > Benton County
- Corvallis (0.04)
- Virginia > Arlington County
- Arlington (0.04)
- Arizona > Maricopa County
- Phoenix (0.04)
- Florida
- Broward County > Hollywood (0.04)
- Palm Beach County > Boca Raton (0.04)
- Illinois > Champaign County
- Champaign (0.04)
- Texas > Travis County
- Austin (0.04)
- New York > New York County
- Canada > Quebec
- Oceania > Samoa (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East
- Genre:
- Overview (1.00)
- Industry:
- Health & Medicine
- Diagnostic Medicine (0.67)
- Therapeutic Area (0.46)
- Information Technology (1.00)
- Health & Medicine
- Technology:
- Information Technology
- Architecture (1.00)
- Artificial Intelligence
- Applied AI (0.92)
- Cognitive Science > Problem Solving (1.00)
- Machine Learning
- Learning Graphical Models
- Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (1.00)
- Undirected Networks > Markov Models (1.00)
- Neural Networks (0.94)
- Statistical Learning (1.00)
- Learning Graphical Models
- Representation & Reasoning
- Diagnosis (1.00)
- Expert Systems (1.00)
- Logic & Formal Reasoning (1.00)
- Rule-Based Reasoning (1.00)
- Search (1.00)
- Uncertainty
- Bayesian Inference (1.00)
- Fuzzy Logic (0.68)
- Communications > Networks (1.00)
- Data Science > Data Mining (1.00)
- Internet of Things (1.00)
- Information Technology