Approaches to Responsible Governance of GenAI in Organizations
Gandhi, Dhari, Joshi, Himanshu, Hartman, Lucas, Hassani, Shabnam
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
PEER-REVIEWED AND ACCEPTED IN IEEE- ISTAS 2025 The rapid evolution of Generative AI (GenAI) has introduced unprecedented opportunities while presenting complex challenges around ethics, accountability, and societal impact. This paper draws on a literature review, established governance frameworks, and industry roundtable discussions to identify core principles for integrating responsible GenAI governance into diverse organizational structures. Our objective is to provide actionable recommendations for a balanced, risk-based governance approach that enables both innovation and oversight. Findings emphasize the need for adaptable risk assessment tools, continuous monitoring practices, and cross-sector collaboration to establish trustworthy GenAI. These insights provide a structured foundation and Responsible GenAI Guide (ResAI) for organizations to align GenAI initiatives with ethical, legal, and operational best practices.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Sep-16-2025
- Country:
- Asia > Singapore (0.04)
- North America
- Canada
- Ontario
- Middlesex County > London (0.04)
- Toronto (0.04)
- Quebec (0.04)
- Ontario
- United States > Massachusetts
- Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- Canada
- Genre:
- Overview (0.34)
- Research Report (0.50)
- Workflow (0.46)
- Industry:
- Banking & Finance (0.93)
- Government (1.00)
- Health & Medicine (1.00)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Law (1.00)
- Technology:
- Information Technology
- Artificial Intelligence
- Issues > Social & Ethical Issues (0.70)
- Machine Learning > Neural Networks
- Deep Learning > Generative AI (0.34)
- Natural Language (1.00)
- Data Science (0.94)
- Information Management (1.00)
- Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Artificial Intelligence
- Information Technology