Efficacy of a Computer Tutor that Models Expert Human Tutors
Olney, Andrew M., D'Mello, Sidney K., Person, Natalie, Cade, Whitney, Hays, Patrick, Dempsey, Claire W., Lehman, Blair, Williams, Betsy, Graesser, Art
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Tutoring is highly effective for promoting learning. However, the contribution of expertise to tutoring effectiveness is unclear and continues to be debated. We conducted a 9-week learning efficacy study of an intelligent tutoring system (ITS) for biology modeled on expert human tutors with two control conditions: human tutors who were experts in the domain but not in tutoring and a no-tutoring condition. All conditions were supplemental to classroom instruction, and students took learning tests immediately before and after tutoring sessions as well as delayed tests 1-2 weeks later. Analysis using logistic mixed-effects modeling indicates significant positive effects on the immediate post-test for the ITS (d =.71) and human tutors (d =.66) which are in the 99th percentile of meta-analytic effects, as well as significant positive effects on the delayed post-test for the ITS (d =.36) and human tutors (d =.39). We discuss implications for the role of expertise in tutoring and the design of future studies.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Apr-24-2025
- Country:
- Europe > United Kingdom
- Scotland > City of Glasgow > Glasgow (0.04)
- North America > United States
- California
- San Mateo County > Menlo Park (0.04)
- Ventura County > Thousand Oaks (0.04)
- Colorado > Boulder County
- Boulder (0.14)
- District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- Florida > Palm Beach County
- Palm Beach (0.04)
- Oregon > Multnomah County
- Portland (0.04)
- Tennessee > Shelby County
- Memphis (0.04)
- Virginia > Arlington County
- Arlington (0.04)
- California
- Europe > United Kingdom
- Genre:
- Instructional Material > Course Syllabus & Notes (1.00)
- Research Report
- Experimental Study > Negative Result (0.47)
- New Finding (1.00)
- Industry:
- Technology: