Evolution of AI Agent Registry Solutions: Centralized, Enterprise, and Distributed Approaches

Singh, Aditi, Ehtesham, Abul, Lambe, Mahesh, Grogan, Jared James, Singh, Abhishek, Kumar, Saket, Muscariello, Luca, Pandey, Vijoy, Marc, Guillaume Sauvage De Saint, Chari, Pradyumna, Raskar, Ramesh

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence 

Abstract--Autonomous AI agents now operate across cloud, enterprise, and decentralized domains, creating demand for registry infrastructures that enable trustworthy discovery, capability negotiation, and identity assurance. We analyze five prominent approaches: (1) MCP Registry (centralized publication of mcp.json descriptors), (2) A2A Agent Cards (decentralized self-describing JSON capability manifests), (3) AGNTCY Agent Directory Service (IPFS Kademlia DHT content routing extended for semantic taxonomy-based content discovery, OCI artifact storage, and Sigstore-backed integrity), (4) Microsoft Entra Agent ID (enterprise SaaS directory with policy and zero-trust integration), and (5) NANDA Index AgentFacts (cryptographically verifiable, privacy-preserving fact model with credentialed assertions). Using four evaluation dimensions--security, authentication, scalability, and maintainability--we surface architectural trade-offs between centralized control, enterprise governance, and distributed resilience. We conclude with design recommendations for an emerging Internet of AI Agents requiring verifiable identity, adaptive discovery flows, and interoperable capability semantics. Autonomous AI agents are rapidly becoming foundational across domains from cloud-native assistants and robotics to decentralized systems and edge-based IoT controllers. These agents act independently, make decisions, and collaborate at scale. As agent populations grow into the billions across heterogeneous platforms and administrative boundaries, the ability to identify, discover, and trust agents in real time has emerged as a critical infrastructure challenge. Traditional mechanisms like DNS and static service catalogs are poorly suited to agent ecosystems, which demand dynamic discovery, verifiable metadata, and privacy-preserving interactions [1]. Legacy systems assume fixed endpoints and ownership-based trust models, lacking the flexibility and cryptographic assurances needed for agents that rotate capabilities, change locations, and form ephemeral collaborations. To address these limitations, several agent frameworks have introduced discovery metadata models.