Learning to Retrieve for Job Matching

Shen, Jianqiang, Juan, Yuchin, Zhang, Shaobo, Liu, Ping, Pu, Wen, Vasudevan, Sriram, Song, Qingquan, Borisyuk, Fedor, Shen, Kay Qianqi, Wei, Haichao, Ren, Yunxiang, Chiou, Yeou S., Kuang, Sicong, Yin, Yuan, Zheng, Ben, Wu, Muchen, Gharghabi, Shaghayegh, Wang, Xiaoqing, Xue, Huichao, Guo, Qi, Hewlett, Daniel, Simon, Luke, Hong, Liangjie, Zhang, Wenjing

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence 

Web-scale search systems typically tackle the scalability challenge As one of the largest professional networking platforms globally, with a two-step paradigm: retrieval and ranking. The retrieval step, LinkedIn is a hub for job seekers and recruiters, with 65M+ job also known as candidate selection, often involves extracting standardized seekers utilizing the search and recommendation services weekly entities, creating an inverted index, and performing term to discover millions of open job listings. To enable realtime personalization matching for retrieval. Such traditional methods require manual for job seekers, we adopted the classic two-stage paradigm and time-consuming development of query models. In this paper, of retrieval and ranking to tackle the scalability challenge. The retrieval we discuss applying learning-to-retrieve technology to enhance layer, also known as candidate selection, chooses a small set LinkedIn's job search and recommendation systems. In the realm of of relevant jobs from the set of all jobs, after which the ranking layer promoted jobs, the key objective is to improve the quality of applicants, performs a more computationally expensive second-pass scoring thereby delivering value to recruiter customers. To achieve and sorting of the resulting candidate set. This paper focuses on this, we leverage confirmed hire data to construct a graph that improving the methodology and systems for retrieval.

Duplicate Docs Excel Report

Title
None found

Similar Docs  Excel Report  more

TitleSimilaritySource
None found