STEM-POM: Evaluating Language Models Math-Symbol Reasoning in Document Parsing
Zou, Jiaru, Wang, Qing, Thakur, Pratyush, Kani, Nickvash
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Advances in large language models (LLMs) have spurred research into enhancing their reasoning capabilities, particularly in math-rich STEM documents. While LLMs can generate equations or solve math-related queries, their ability to fully understand and interpret abstract mathematical symbols in long, math-rich documents remains limited. In this paper, we introduce STEM-PoM, a comprehensive benchmark dataset designed to evaluate LLMs' reasoning abilities on math symbols within contextual scientific text. The dataset, sourced from real-world ArXiv documents, contains over 2K math symbols classified as main attributes of variables, constants, operators, and unit descriptors, with additional sub-attributes including scalar/vector/matrix for variables and local/global/discipline-specific labels for both constants and operators. Our extensive experiments show that state-of-the-art LLMs achieve an average of 20-60% accuracy under in-context learning and 50-60% accuracy with fine-tuning, revealing a significant gap in their mathematical reasoning capabilities. STEM-PoM fuels future research of developing advanced Math-AI models that can robustly handle math symbols.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Nov-1-2024
- Country:
- North America > United States
- Illinois > Champaign County > Champaign (0.05)
- Europe > Romania
- Vest Development Region > Timiș County > Timișoara (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East
- Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.82)
- Technology: