Acquisition of Recursive Possessives and Recursive Locatives in Mandarin

Language is the cornerstone of human communication, and the complexity of language lies in the diversity and recursion of its structure. Chomsky (1957) introduced the concept of recursion into natural language, arguing that the grammar in human natural language was a finite set of recursive rules by which an infinite number of linguistic expressions could be generated. In Corballis' (2014) words, the claim that recursion is the essence of natural language has been a continuing theme of Chomsky's work since his 1957 book Syntactic Structures. This theme is reiterated in Hauser et al. (2002), proposing that the faculty of language in the narrow sense only includes recursion, the only uniquely human component of the faculty of language. This proposal is summarized as the "recursion-only hypothesis" in Jackendoff and Pinker (2005: 212), which highlights the importance of recursion in linguistics. In spited of the lack of a consistent definition of (linguistic) recursion in the literature, most literature involves category recursion, which is defined as the "embedding of a category inside another of the same category". For instance, Martins and Fitch (2014) claim that recursion has been used to characterize the process of embedding a constituent of a certain kind of category inside another constituent of the same kind. This "embedding" process naturally generates hierarchical structures that display similar properties across different levels of embedding, and, thus, the feature of "self-similarity" is a signature of recursive structures. To illustrate that, they hold that the compound noun [[student] committee] (which has the structure [[[A]A] ]) is recursive since a noun phrase (NP) is embedded inside another NP, while a sentence with a noun plus a verb such as [[trees] grow] (which has the structure [[[A]B] ]) is non-recursive since a constituent of a given type of category is not embedded within a constituent of that same type.