Expert Systems
Contextual hypotheses and semantics of logic programs
Logic programming has developed as a rich field, built over a logical substratum whose main constituent is a nonclassical form of negation, sometimes coexisting with classical negation. The field has seen the advent of a number of alternative semantics, with Kripke-Kleene semantics, the well-founded semantics, the stable model semantics, and the answer-set semantics standing out as the most successful. We show that all aforementioned semantics are particular cases of a generic semantics, in a framework where classical negation is the unique form of negation and where the literals in the bodies of the rules can be `marked' to indicate that they can be the targets of hypotheses. A particular semantics then amounts to choosing a particular marking scheme and choosing a particular set of hypotheses. When a literal belongs to the chosen set of hypotheses, all marked occurrences of that literal in the body of a rule are assumed to be true, whereas the occurrences of that literal that have not been marked in the body of the rule are to be derived in order to contribute to the firing of the rule. Hence the notion of hypothetical reasoning that is presented in this framework is not based on making global assumptions, but more subtly on making local, contextual assumptions, taking effect as indicated by the chosen marking scheme on the basis of the chosen set of hypotheses. Our approach offers a unified view on the various semantics proposed in logic programming, classical in that only classical negation is used, and links the semantics of logic programs to mechanisms that endow rule-based systems with the power to harness hypothetical reasoning.
Splitting and Updating Hybrid Knowledge Bases (Extended Version)
Slota, Martin, Leite, João, Swift, Terrance
Over the years, nonmonotonic rules have proven to be a very expressive and useful knowledge representation paradigm. They have recently been used to complement the expressive power of Description Logics (DLs), leading to the study of integrative formal frameworks, generally referred to as hybrid knowledge bases, where both DL axioms and rules can be used to represent knowledge. The need to use these hybrid knowledge bases in dynamic domains has called for the development of update operators, which, given the substantially different way Description Logics and rules are usually updated, has turned out to be an extremely difficult task. In [SL10], a first step towards addressing this problem was taken, and an update operator for hybrid knowledge bases was proposed. Despite its significance -- not only for being the first update operator for hybrid knowledge bases in the literature, but also because it has some applications - this operator was defined for a restricted class of problems where only the ABox was allowed to change, which considerably diminished its applicability. Many applications that use hybrid knowledge bases in dynamic scenarios require both DL axioms and rules to be updated. In this paper, motivated by real world applications, we introduce an update operator for a large class of hybrid knowledge bases where both the DL component as well as the rule component are allowed to dynamically change. We introduce splitting sequences and splitting theorem for hybrid knowledge bases, use them to define a modular update semantics, investigate its basic properties, and illustrate its use on a realistic example about cargo imports.
Scaling up Heuristic Planning with Relational Decision Trees
De la Rosa, T., Jimenez, S., Fuentetaja, R., Borrajo, D.
Current evaluation functions for heuristic planning are expensive to compute. In numerous planning problems these functions provide good guidance to the solution, so they are worth the expense. However, when evaluation functions are misguiding or when planning problems are large enough, lots of node evaluations must be computed, which severely limits the scalability of heuristic planners. In this paper, we present a novel solution for reducing node evaluations in heuristic planning based on machine learning. Particularly, we define the task of learning search control for heuristic planning as a relational classification task, and we use an off-the-shelf relational classification tool to address this learning task. Our relational classification task captures the preferred action to select in the different planning contexts of a specific planning domain. These planning contexts are defined by the set of helpful actions of the current state, the goals remaining to be achieved, and the static predicates of the planning task. This paper shows two methods for guiding the search of a heuristic planner with the learned classifiers. The first one consists of using the resulting classifier as an action policy. The second one consists of applying the classifier to generate lookahead states within a Best First Search algorithm. Experiments over a variety of domains reveal that our heuristic planner using the learned classifiers solves larger problems than state-of-the-art planners.
On the evolution of the instance level of DL-lite knowledge bases
Lenzerini, Maurizio, Savo, Domenico Fabio
Recent papers address the issue of updating the instance level of knowledge bases expressed in Description Logic following a model-based approach. One of the outcomes of these papers is that the result of updating a knowledge base K is generally not expressible in the Description Logic used to express K. In this paper we introduce a formula-based approach to this problem, by revisiting some research work on formula-based updates developed in the '80s, in particular the WIDTIO (When In Doubt, Throw It Out) approach. We show that our operator enjoys desirable properties, including that both insertions and deletions according to such operator can be expressed in the DL used for the original KB. Also, we present polynomial time algorithms for the evolution of the instance level knowledge bases expressed in the most expressive Description Logics of the DL-lite family.
An expert system for detecting automobile insurance fraud using social network analysis
Šubelj, Lovro, Furlan, Štefan, Bajec, Marko
The article proposes an expert system for detection, and subsequent investigation, of groups of collaborating automobile insurance fraudsters. The system is described and examined in great detail, several technical difficulties in detecting fraud are also considered, for it to be applicable in practice. Opposed to many other approaches, the system uses networks for representation of data. Networks are the most natural representation of such a relational domain, allowing formulation and analysis of complex relations between entities. Fraudulent entities are found by employing a novel assessment algorithm, \textit{Iterative Assessment Algorithm} (\textit{IAA}), also presented in the article. Besides intrinsic attributes of entities, the algorithm explores also the relations between entities. The prototype was evaluated and rigorously analyzed on real world data. Results show that automobile insurance fraud can be efficiently detected with the proposed system and that appropriate data representation is vital.
Closed-set-based Discovery of Bases of Association Rules
Balcázar, José L., García-Saiz, Diego, Gómez-Pérez, Domingo, Tîrnăucă, Cristina
The output of an association rule miner is often huge in practice. This is why several concise lossless representations have been proposed, such as the "essential" or "representative" rules. We revisit the algorithm given by Kryszkiewicz (Int. Symp. Intelligent Data Analysis 2001, Springer-Verlag LNCS 2189, 350-359) for mining representative rules. We show that its output is sometimes incomplete, due to an oversight in its mathematical validation. We propose alternative complete generators and we extend the approach to an existing closure-aware basis similar to, and often smaller than, the representative rules, namely the basis B*.
An Interface for Crowd-Sourcing Spatial Models of Commonsense
Johnston, Benjamin (University of Technology, Sydney)
Commonsense is a challenge not only for representation and reasoning but also for large scale knowledge engineering required to capture the breadth of our "everyday" world. One approach to knowledge engineering is to "outsource" the effort to the public through games that generate structured commonsense knowledge from user play. To date, such games have focused on symbolic and textual knowledge. However, an effective commonsense reasoning system will require spatial and physical reasoning capabilities. In this paper, I propose a tool for gathering commonsense information from ordinary people. It is a user-friendly 3D sculpting tool for modeling and annotating models of physical objects and spaces.
Combining Uncertainty and Description Logic Rule-Based Reasoning in Situation-Aware Robots
Krieger, Hans-Ulrich (DFKI GmbH, German Research Center For Artificial Intelligence) | Kruijff, Geert-Jan M. (DFKI GmbH, German Research Center For Artificial Intelligence)
The paper addresses how a robot can maintain a state representation of all that it knows about the environment over time and space, given its observations and its domain knowledge. The advantage in combining domain knowledge and observations is that the robot can in this way project from the past into the future, and reason from observations to more general statements to help guide how it plans to act and interact. The difficulty lies in the fact that observations are typically uncertain and logical inference for completion against a knowledge base is computationally hard.
On the Collaborative Formalization of Agile Semantics Using Social Network Applications
Fill, Hans-Georg (Stanford University) | Tudorache, Tania (Stanford University)
In this position paper we investigate the opportunities of using functionalities provided by social network sites for the collaborative formalization of semantics in the domain of health. In particular we identified benefits in regard to communication support, economic benefits, and technical opportunities. The implementation of the functionalities are illustrated by describing a use case from an ongoing project with the World Health Organization.
Opportunities for AI to Improve Sustainable Building Design Processes
Haymaker, John R. (Design Process Innovation)
Sustainable building design is a complex social and technical process in which a broad range of stakeholders must construct and clearly communicate high quality design spaces. This paper summarizes recent assessments of current practice that illustrate how far industry today is from achieving this quality and clarity. Efforts to develop a platform of tools to address these limitations are discussed. PIP helps people communicate, share, and understand collaborative design processes; MACDADI helps project teams identify and manage rationale and consensus on decisions; Design Scenarios helps them generate requirements-driven alternative spaces, BIM, model-based analysis, and PIDO which helps to systematically assess these alternatives for their energy, daylight, structural, and cost impacts; and iRooms and the web, which help to communicate all of this information to engage designers, stakeholders, and decision makers in fast, multidisciplinary design and analysis processes. This new platform considerably improves the quality and clarity of AEC design spaces. However additional work would enable significant additional improvement. The paper concludes with a proposal for how AI might further improve the performance of this platform.