Learning an input-output mapping from a set of examples can be regarded as synthesizing an approximation of a multidimensional function.

Recurrent Cascade-Correlation CRCC) is a recurrent version of the Cascade Correlation learning architecture of Fah I man and Lebiere [Fahlman, 1990]. RCC can learn from examples to map a sequence of inputs into a desired sequence of outputs. New hidden units with recurrent connections are added to the network as needed during training. In effect, the network builds up a finite-state machine tailored specifically for the current problem. RCC retains the advantages of Cascade-Correlation: fast learning, good generalization, automatic construction of a near-minimal multi-layered network, and incremental training. Initially the network contains only inputs, output units, and the connections between them.

Bruno Caprile I.R.S.T. Povo, Italy, 38050 Learning an input-output mapping from a set of examples can be regarded as synthesizing an approximation of a multidimensional function.

The issues of scaling and generalization have emerged as key issues in current studies of supervised learning from examples in neural networks. Questions such as how many training patterns and training cycles are needed for a problem of a given size and difficulty, how to represent the inllUh and how to choose useful training exemplars, are of considerable theoretical and practical importance. Several intuitive rules of thumb have been obtained from empirical studies, but as yet there are few rigorous results.In this paper we summarize a study Qf generalization in the simplest possible case-perceptron networks learning linearly separable functions.The task chosen was the majority function (i.e. return a 1 if a majority of the input units are on), a predicate with a number ofuseful properties. We find that many aspects of.generalization in multilayer networks learning large, difficult tasks are reproduced in this simple domain, in which concrete numerical results and even some analytic understanding can be achieved.

We consider a 2-layer, 3-node, n-input neural network whose nodes compute linear threshold functions of their inputs. We show that it is NPcomplete to decide whether there exist weights and thresholds for the three nodes of this network so that it will produce output consistent with a given set of training examples. We extend the result to other simple networks. This result suggests that those looking for perfect training algorithms cannot escape inherent computational difficulties just by considering only simple or very regular networks. It also suggests the importance, given a training problem, of finding an appropriate network and input encoding for that problem. It is left as an open problem to extend our result to nodes with nonlinear functions such as sigmoids.

What follows extends some of our results of [1] on learning from examples in layered feed-forward networks of linear units. In particular we examine what happens when the ntunber of layers is large or when the connectivity between layers is local and investigate some of the properties of an autoassociative algorithm. Notation will be as in [1] where additional motivations and references can be found. It is usual to criticize linear networks because "linear functions do not compute" and because several layers can always be reduced to one by the proper multiplication of matrices. However this is not the point of view adopted here.

We address the question of when a network can be expected to generalize from m random training examples chosen from some arbitrary probability distribution, assuming that future test examples are drawn from the same distribution. Among our results are the following bounds on appropriate sample vs. network size.

The issues of scaling and generalization have emerged as key issues in current studies of supervised learning from examples in neural networks. Questions such as how many training patterns and training cycles are needed for a problem of a given size and difficulty, how to represent the inllUh and how to choose useful training exemplars, are of considerable theoretical and practical importance. Several intuitive rules of thumb have been obtained from empirical studies, but as yet there are few rigorous results. In this paper we summarize a study Qf generalization in the simplest possible case-perceptron networks learning linearly separable functions. The task chosen was the majority function (i.e. return a 1 if a majority of the input units are on), a predicate with a number of useful properties. We find that many aspects of.generalization in multilayer networks learning large, difficult tasks are reproduced in this simple domain, in which concrete numerical results and even some analytic understanding can be achieved.

Over the last eight years, four workshops on machine learning have been held. Participation in these workshops was by invitation only. In response to the rapid growth in the number of researchers active in machine learning, it was decided that the fifth meeting should be a conference with open attendance and full review for presented papers. Thus, the first open conference on machine learning took place 12 to 14 June 1988 at The University of Michigan at Ann Arbor.

Machine Learning, 3, 261–283.