Inductive Learning


r/deeplearning - Self-supervised learning in the area of aesthetics

#artificialintelligence

How can we leverage self-supervised learning in evaluating "aestheticsness" of an image? Does anyone have experience with that?


Two New Papers Discuss How Alexa Recognizes Sounds : Alexa Blogs

#artificialintelligence

Last year, Amazon announced the beta release of Alexa Guard, a new service that lets customers who are leaving the house instruct their Echo devices to listen for glass breaking or smoke and carbon dioxide alarms going off. At this year's International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, our team is presenting several papers on sound detection. I wrote about one of them a few weeks ago, a new method for doing machine learning with unbalanced data sets. Today I'll briefly discuss two others, both of which, like the first, describe machine learning systems. One paper addresses the problem of media detection, or recognizing when the speech captured by a digital-assistant device comes from a TV or radio rather than a human speaker.


A Primal-Dual Message-Passing Algorithm for Approximated Large Scale Structured Prediction

Neural Information Processing Systems

In this paper we propose an approximated learning framework for large scale graphical models and derive message passing algorithms for learning their parameters efficiently. We first relate CRFs and structured SVMs and show that in the CRF's primal a variant of the log-partition function, known as soft-max, smoothly approximates the hinge loss function of structured SVMs. We then propose an intuitive approximation for structured prediction problems using Fenchel duality based on a local entropy approximation that computes the exact gradients of the approximated problem and is guaranteed to converge. Unlike existing approaches, this allow us to learn graphical models with cycles and very large number of parameters efficiently. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in an image denoising task.


r/MachineLearning - [D] Are we renaming Unsupervised Learning to Self-Supervised Learning?

#artificialintelligence

Self-supervised learning uses way more supervisory signals than supervised learning, and enormously more than reinforcement learning. That's why calling it "unsupervised" is totally misleading. That's also why more knowledge about the structure of the world can be learned through self-supervised learning than from the other two paradigms: the data is unlimited, and amount of feedback provided by each example is huge.


Reliable Weakly Supervised Learning: Maximize Gain and Maintain Safeness

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Weakly supervised data are widespread and have attracted much attention. However, since label quality is often difficult to guarantee, sometimes the use of weakly supervised data will lead to unsatisfactory performance, i.e., performance degradation or poor performance gains. Moreover, it is usually not feasible to manually increase the label quality, which results in weakly supervised learning being somewhat difficult to rely on. In view of this crucial issue, this paper proposes a simple and novel weakly supervised learning framework. We guide the optimization of label quality through a small amount of validation data, and to ensure the safeness of performance while maximizing performance gain. As validation set is a good approximation for describing generalization risk, it can effectively avoid the unsatisfactory performance caused by incorrect data distribution assumptions. We formalize this underlying consideration into a novel Bi-Level optimization and give an effective solution. Extensive experimental results verify that the new framework achieves impressive performance on weakly supervised learning with a small amount of validation data.


Repurposing Entailment for Multi-Hop Question Answering Tasks

arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence

Question Answering (QA) naturally reduces to an entailment problem, namely, verifying whether some text entails the answer to a question. However, for multi-hop QA tasks, which require reasoning with multiple sentences, it remains unclear how best to utilize entailment models pre-trained on large scale datasets such as SNLI, which are based on sentence pairs. We introduce Multee, a general architecture that can effectively use entailment models for multi-hop QA tasks. Multee uses (i) a local module that helps locate important sentences, thereby avoiding distracting information, and (ii) a global module that aggregates information by effectively incorporating importance weights. Importantly, we show that both modules can use entailment functions pre-trained on a large scale NLI datasets. We evaluate performance on MultiRC and OpenBookQA, two multihop QA datasets. When using an entailment function pre-trained on NLI datasets, Multee outperforms QA models trained only on the target QA datasets and the OpenAI transformer models. The code is available at https://github.com/StonyBrookNLP/multee.


Computational Learning Theory

#artificialintelligence

Theoretical results in machine learning mainly deal with a type of inductive learning called supervised learning. In supervised learning, an algorithm is given samples that are labeled in some useful way. For example, the samples might be descriptions of mushrooms, and the labels could be whether or not the mushrooms are edible. The algorithm takes these previously labeled samples and uses them to induce a classifier. This classifier is a function that assigns labels to samples including the samples that have never been previously seen by the algorithm.


Flux: The Elegant Machine Learning Library Mike Innes

#artificialintelligence

Flux is a new machine learning library that's easy and intuitive to use with state-of-the-art performance. I'll show how we achieve this using Julia's advanced features alongside modern compiler and language technology, as well as cool things that people are doing with Flux.


Split Batch Normalization: Improving Semi-Supervised Learning under Domain Shift

arXiv.org Machine Learning

Recent work has shown that using unlabeled data in semi-supervised learning is not always beneficial and can even hurt generalization, especially when there is a class mismatch between the unlabeled and labeled examples. We investigate this phenomenon for image classification on the CIFAR-10 and the ImageNet datasets, and with many other forms of domain shifts applied (e.g. salt-and-pepper noise). Our main contribution is Split Batch Normalization (Split-BN), a technique to improve SSL when the additional unlabeled data comes from a shifted distribution. We achieve it by using separate batch normalization statistics for unlabeled examples. Due to its simplicity, we recommend it as a standard practice. Finally, we analyse how domain shift affects the SSL training process. In particular, we find that during training the statistics of hidden activations in late layers become markedly different between the unlabeled and the labeled examples.


Few-shot brain segmentation from weakly labeled data with deep heteroscedastic multi-task networks

arXiv.org Machine Learning

In applications of supervised learning applied to medical image segmentation, the need for large amounts of labeled data typically goes unquestioned. In particular, in the case of brain anatomy segmentation, hundreds or thousands of weakly-labeled volumes are often used as training data. In this paper, we first observe that for many brain structures, a small number of training examples, (n=9), weakly labeled using Freesurfer 6.0, plus simple data augmentation, suffice as training data to achieve high performance, achieving an overall mean Dice coefficient of $0.84 \pm 0.12$ compared to Freesurfer over 28 brain structures in T1-weighted images of $\approx 4000$ 9-10 year-olds from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study. We then examine two varieties of heteroscedastic network as a method for improving classification results. An existing proposal by Kendall and Gal, which uses Monte-Carlo inference to learn to predict the variance of each prediction, yields an overall mean Dice of $0.85 \pm 0.14$ and showed statistically significant improvements over 25 brain structures. Meanwhile a novel heteroscedastic network which directly learns the probability that an example has been mislabeled yielded an overall mean Dice of $0.87 \pm 0.11$ and showed statistically significant improvements over all but one of the brain structures considered. The loss function associated to this network can be interpreted as performing a form of learned label smoothing, where labels are only smoothed where they are judged to be uncertain.