predictor
Country:
- North America > United States > California > Alameda County > Berkeley (0.14)
- Oceania > Australia > New South Wales > Sydney (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
Technology:
Technology:
Country:
- North America > Canada > Alberta (0.14)
- North America > United States > Georgia > Chatham County > Savannah (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > Bavaria > Upper Bavaria > Munich (0.04)
- (3 more...)
Technology:
Country:
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Alameda County > Berkeley (0.04)
Technology:
Country:
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > China > Hong Kong (0.04)
Technology:
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Performance Analysis > Accuracy (0.93)
- Information Technology > Sensing and Signal Processing (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.68)
- Information Technology > Data Science > Data Mining > Anomaly Detection (0.68)
Country:
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Greater London > London (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- (2 more...)
Technology:
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (1.00)
Technology:
Figure 9: In experiments, we used a common feature-extractor (F
Here, we include implementation details omitted from the main paper for brevity. Upon acceptance, a deanonymized repository will be released. The last layer's dimension depended upon the exact The feature extractors and decoders varied by domain. In particular, we found that if we did not apply this linear transformation (i.e., pass the raw encodings For VQ-based methods, use a large enough codebook to have at least one element per class. Other differences simply reflected differences in architecture (e.g., For iNat, we trained all models with batch size 256, using the hyperparameters specified in Table 3.