nazir
Short story accused of being AI-written wins overall Commonwealth prize
'This story began in my childhood in rural Trinidad' Jamir Nazir. 'This story began in my childhood in rural Trinidad' Jamir Nazir. Jamir Nazir's The Serpent in the Grove, which critics allege has'obvious markers' of AI use, was described as'original, poetic and deeply moving' by the judging chair A story widely accused on social media of being written using AI has gone on to win the overall Commonwealth short story prize. Jamir Nazir's story The Serpent in the Grove went viral after being named as a regional winner in mid-May, with critics on X and Bluesky claiming it showed "obvious markers" of AI use. The literary magazine Granta subsequently pulled out of its long-running agreement to publish the Commonwealth winners.
Did a Chatbot Write a Prize-Winning Story? Does It Matter?
Did a Chatbot Write a Prize-Winning Story? If the possibility that one or more of the winners of the Commonwealth Short Story Prize was A.I.-generated chills us, it may be because of what it reveals about human writing. In early May, the Commonwealth Foundation announced the five regional winners for its influential Short Story Prize, which recognizes unpublished short fiction. One of the awardees, a Trinidadian writer named Jamir Nazir, was accused of A.I.-assisted cheating by a broad array of social-media users who seized upon his story's synthetic tics, glitchy metaphors, and general unreadability. "Maybe it was a name; maybe rain took a shape and decided to keep it.")
A dating app, a niqab and a 9mm gun - how a US woman was hired to end a UK family feud
Betro initially fled the scene but returned by taxi just after midnight and fired three shots at the family home. By 13:30 BST, she was at Manchester Airport and flew to the US, prosecutors said. Days later, Nazir followed and according to Betro, the pair rented a car and drove to Seattle "just for a road trip" with stops at an amusement park, Area 51 in Nevada, Los Angeles and San Francisco. She told jurors she did not know there had been a shooting in Measham Grove and Nazir had not mentioned it during his time in the States. The investigation to find Betro and bring her co-conspirators to justice not only spanned several years but was hampered by the pandemic and involved the FBI, National Crime Agency and two UK police forces.
How Autodesk gave its chatbot the smarts needed to increase engagement, conversions - MarTech Today
The concept of chatbots is great for companies that are looking for efficiencies -- hand off simple communication tasks to automation so that humans can either concentrate on more complicated work, or be eliminated altogether. But have chatbots lived up to their promise? A recent survey from automation provider Pegasystems says that chatbots have lagged significantly behind customer expectations, mostly because they aren't smart enough. At our MarTech East conference earlier this month in Boston, Autodesk's Head of Digital Marketing Siara Nazir explained how her team was able to deliver a more intelligent chatbot experience using artificial intelligence (AI). According to her and her team, chatbots, paired with the right tech, can increase engagement and speed up conversions.
Zee Media Exclusive: Air India officials given kickbacks by Canadian company to bag tender
Delhi: In one of the biggest exposes of 2016, it has been revealed that in order to bag tender for biometric facial recognition device, Cryptometrics, a company in Canada, gave kickbacks to officers of Air India. Biometric facial recognition device is used for recognition of faces of passengers. In an exclusive report, Zee Media Corp has learnt that on 24 February 2006, Air India had issued a Request for Proposal for the device and the tender for the same given by 20 companies including Canada's Cryptometrics. Later, it was revealed in order to get the tender, Cryptometrics paid kickbacks to Air India officials through a person named Nazir Karigar. His closeness with Air India officials can be ascertained from the fact that Nazir had the full copy of the tender with him on 28 December 2005 itself. Whereas Air India had issued the tender on 24 February 2006.