Successful group meetings, such as those implemented in group behavioral-change programs, work meetings, and other social contexts, must promote individual goal setting and execution while strengthening the social relationships within the group. Consequently, an ideal facilitator must be sensitive to the subtle dynamics of disengagement, difficulties with individual goal setting and execution, and interpersonal difficulties that signal a need for intervention. The challenges and cognitive load experienced by facilitators create a critical gap for an embodied technology that can interpret social exchanges while remaining aware of the needs of the individuals in the group and providing transparent recommendations that go beyond powerful but "black box" foundation models (FMs) that identify social cues. We address this important demand with a social robot co-facilitator that analyzes multimodal meeting data and provides discreet cues to the facilitator. The robot's reasoning is powered by an agentic concept bottleneck model (CBM), which makes decisions based on human-interpretable concepts like participant engagement and sentiments, ensuring transparency and trustworthiness. Our core contribution is a transfer learning framework that distills the broad social understanding of an FM into our specialized and transparent CBM. This concept-driven system significantly outperforms direct zero-shot FMs in predicting the need for intervention and enables real-time human correction of its reasoning. Critically, we demonstrate robust knowledge transfer: the model generalizes across different groups and successfully transfers the expertise of senior human facilitators to improve the performance of novices. By transferring an expert's cognitive model into an interpretable robotic partner, our work provides a powerful blueprint for augmenting human capabilities in complex social domains.

Large language models (LLMs) have advanced the development of various AI conversational agents, including role-playing conversational agents that mimic diverse characters and human behaviors. While prior research has predominantly focused on enhancing the conversational capability, role-specific knowledge, and stylistic attributes of these agents, there has been a noticeable gap in assessing their social intelligence. In this paper, we introduce RoleInteract, the first benchmark designed to systematically evaluate the sociality of role-playing conversational agents at both individual and group levels of social interactions. The benchmark is constructed from a variety of sources and covers a wide range of 500 characters and over 6,000 question prompts and 30,800 multi-turn role-playing utterances. We conduct comprehensive evaluations on this benchmark using mainstream open-source and closed-source LLMs. We find that agents excelling in individual level does not imply their proficiency in group level. Moreover, the behavior of individuals may drift as a result of the influence exerted by other agents within the group. Experimental results on RoleInteract confirm its significance as a testbed for assessing the social interaction of role-playing conversational agents. The benchmark is publicly accessible at https://github.com/X-PLUG/RoleInteract.

This study addresses the challenge of forming effective groups in collaborative problem-solving environments. Recognizing the complexity of human interactions and the necessity for efficient collaboration, we propose a novel approach leveraging graph theory and reinforcement learning. Our methodology involves constructing a graph from a dataset where nodes represent participants, and edges signify the interactions between them. We conceptualize each participant as an agent within a reinforcement learning framework, aiming to learn an optimal graph structure that reflects effective group dynamics. Clustering techniques are employed to delineate clear group structures based on the learned graph. Our approach provides theoretical solutions based on evaluation metrics and graph measurements, offering insights into potential improvements in group effectiveness and reductions in conflict incidences. This research contributes to the fields of collaborative work and educational psychology by presenting a data-driven, analytical approach to group formation. It has practical implications for organizational team building, classroom settings, and any collaborative scenario where group dynamics are crucial. The study opens new avenues for exploring the application of graph theory and reinforcement learning in social and behavioral sciences, highlighting the potential for empirical validation in future work.

Delivering personalised, formative feedback to multiple problem-based learning groups in a short time period can be almost impossible. We employed ChatGPT to provide personalised formative feedback in a one-hour Zoom break-out room activity that taught practicing health professionals how to formulate evaluation plans for digital health initiatives. Learners completed an evaluation survey that included Likert scales and open-ended questions that were analysed. Half of the 44 survey respondents had never used ChatGPT before. Overall, respondents found the feedback favourable, described a wide range of group dynamics, and had adaptive responses to the feedback, yet only three groups used the feedback loop to improve their evaluation plans. Future educators can learn from our experience including engineering prompts, providing instructions on how to use ChatGPT, and scaffolding optimal group interactions with ChatGPT. Future researchers should explore the influence of ChatGPT on group dynamics and derive design principles for the use of ChatGPT in collaborative learning.

Social mediator robots facilitate human-human interactions by producing behavior strategies that positively influence how humans interact with each other in social settings. As robots for social mediation gain traction in the field of human-human-robot interaction, their ability to "understand" the humans in their environments becomes crucial. This objective requires models of human understanding that consider multiple humans in an interaction as a collective entity and represent the group dynamics that exist among its members. Group dynamics are defined as the influential actions, processes, and changes that occur within and between group interactants. Since an individual's behavior may be deeply influenced by their interactions with other group members, the social dynamics existing within a group can influence the behaviors, attitudes, and opinions of each individual and the group as a whole. Therefore, models of group dynamics are critical for a social mediator robot to be effective in its role. In this paper, we survey existing models of group dynamics and categorize them into models of social dominance, affect, social cohesion, conflict resolution, and engagement. We highlight the multimodal features these models utilize, and emphasize the importance of capturing the interpersonal aspects of a social interaction. Finally, we make a case for models of relational affect as an approach that may be able to capture a representation of human-human interactions that can be useful for social mediation.

The field of human-human-robot interaction (HHRI) uses social robots to positively influence how humans interact with each other. This objective requires models of human understanding that consider multiple humans in an interaction as a collective entity and represent the group dynamics that exist within it. Understanding group dynamics is important because these can influence the behaviors, attitudes, and opinions of each individual within the group, as well as the group as a whole. Such an understanding is also useful when personalizing an interaction between a robot and the humans in its environment, where a group-level model can facilitate the design of robot behaviors that are tailored to a given group, the dynamics that exist within it, and the specific needs and preferences of the individual interactants. In this paper, we highlight the need for group-level models of human understanding in human-human-robot interaction research and how these can be useful in developing personalization techniques. We survey existing models of group dynamics and categorize them into models of social dominance, affect, social cohesion, and conflict resolution. We highlight the important features these models utilize, evaluate their potential to capture interpersonal aspects of a social interaction, and highlight their value for personalization techniques. Finally, we identify directions for future work, and make a case for models of relational affect as an approach that can better capture group-level understanding of human-human interactions and be useful in personalizing human-human-robot interactions.

Transactive Memory System (TMS) is a group theory that describes how communication can enable the combination of individual minds into a group. While this theory has been extensively studied in human-human groups, it has not yet been formally applied to socially assistive robot design. We demonstrate how the three-phase TMS group communication process-which involves encoding, storage, and retrieval-can be leveraged to improve decision making in socially assistive robots with multiple stakeholders. By clearly defining how the robot is gaining information, storing and updating its memory, and retrieving information from its memory, we believe that socially assistive robots can make better decisions and provide more transparency behind their actions in the group context. Bringing communication theory to robot design can provide a clear framework to help robots integrate better into human-human group dynamics and thus improve their acceptance and use.

Mesoscale structures are an integral part of the abstraction and analysis of complex systems. They reveal a node's function in the network, and facilitate our understanding of the network dynamics. For example, they can represent communities in social or citation networks, roles in corporate interactions, or core-periphery structures in transportation networks. We usually detect mesoscale structures under the assumption of independence of interactions. Still, in many cases, the interactions invalidate this assumption by occurring in a specific order. Such patterns emerge in pathway data; to capture them, we have to model the dependencies between interactions using higher-order network models. However, the detection of mesoscale structures in higher-order networks is still under-researched. In this work, we derive a Bayesian approach that simultaneously models the optimal partitioning of nodes in groups and the optimal higher-order network dynamics between the groups. In synthetic data we demonstrate that our method can recover both standard proximity-based communities and role-based groupings of nodes. In synthetic and real world data we show that it can compete with baseline techniques, while additionally providing interpretable abstractions of network dynamics.

Inclusion and Identity – Learn how we internalize group values and goals and how our social groups become part of the way we identify ourselves. We'll explore how these identity processes influence our behavior and how they can lead to a sense of group cohesion. Group Formation Principles – Learn what types of people are attracted to group settings and what types of factors contribute to attraction and relationship formation. We'll also explore the different individual motivations that drive people into group settings and explore ways of overcoming social anxiety and loneliness. Group Development and Group Cohesion – Learn how all groups go through a predictable set of stages and how these stages influence behavior.

The self-help industry in the US is massive. With the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare taking off this year, companies creating AI-enabled tools to understand the mental health of individuals and their behaviors in group settings. With more information, help can be provided by healthcare providers and on the individual level. Two early-stage startups that are working in this area are SignalActionAI and Luther AI. Successful people are often identified by their ability to be more aware of their actions and behaviors.