Reinforcement Learning agent and a configurator that can modify some environmental parameters to improve the agent's performance.

Reinforcement Learning agent and a configurator that can modify some environmental parameters to improve the agent's performance.

The systematic assessment of AI systems is increasingly vital as these technologies enter high-stakes domains. To address this, the EU's Artificial Intelligence Act introduces AI Regulatory Sandboxes (AIRS): supervised environments where AI systems can be tested under the oversight of Competent Authorities (CAs), balancing innovation with compliance, particularly for startups and SMEs. Yet significant challenges remain: assessment methods are fragmented, tests lack standardisation, and feedback loops between developers and regulators are weak. To bridge these gaps, we propose the Sandbox Configurator, a modular open-source framework that enables users to select domain-relevant tests from a shared library and generate customised sandbox environments with integrated dashboards. Its plug-in architecture aims to support both open and proprietary modules, fostering a shared ecosystem of interoperable AI assessment services. The framework aims to address multiple stakeholders: CAs gain structured workflows for applying legal obligations; technical experts can integrate robust evaluation methods; and AI providers access a transparent pathway to compliance. By promoting cross-border collaboration and standardisation, the Sandbox Configurator's goal is to support a scalable and innovation-friendly European infrastructure for trustworthy AI governance.

Reinforcement Learning agent and a configurator that can modify some environmental parameters to improve the agent's performance.

The Configurable Markov Decision Process framework includes two entities: a Reinforcement Learning agent and a configurator that can modify some environmental parameters to improve the agent's performance. This presupposes that the two actors have the same reward functions. What if the configurator does not have the same intentions as the agent? This paper introduces the Non-Cooperative Configurable Markov Decision Process, a setting that allows having two (possibly different) reward functions for the configurator and the agent. Then, we consider an online learning problem, where the configurator has to find the best among a finite set of possible configurations.

We present a hierarchical framework to solve robot planning as an input control problem. At the lowest level are temporary closed control loops, ("tasks"), each representing a behaviour, contingent on a specific sensory input and therefore temporary. At the highest level, a supervising "Configurator" directs task creation and termination. Here resides "core" knowledge as a physics engine, where sequences of tasks can be simulated. The Configurator encodes and interprets simulation results, based on which it can choose a sequence of tasks as a plan. We implement this framework on a real robot and test it in an overtaking scenario as proof-of-concept.

Living organisms interact with their surroundings in a closed-loop fashion, where sensory inputs dictate the initiation and termination of behaviours. Even simple animals are able to develop and execute complex plans, which has not yet been replicated in robotics using pure closed-loop input control. We propose a solution to this problem by defining a set of discrete and temporary closed-loop controllers, called "tasks", each representing a closed-loop behaviour. We further introduce a supervisory module which has an innate understanding of physics and causality, through which it can simulate the execution of task sequences over time and store the results in a model of the environment. On the basis of this model, plans can be made by chaining temporary closed-loop controllers. The proposed framework was implemented for a real robot and tested in two scenarios as proof of concept.

Integrating robot systems into manufacturing lines is a time-consuming process. In the era of digitalization, the research and development of new technologies is crucial for improving integration processes. Numerous challenges, including the lack of standardization, as well as intricate stakeholder relationships, complicate the process of robotic systems integration. This process typically consists of acquisition, integration, and deployment of the robot systems. This thesis focuses on three areas that help automate and simplify robotic systems integration. In the first area, related to acquisition, a constraint-based configurator is demonstrated that resolves compatibility challenges between robot devices, and automates the configuration process. This reduces the risk of integrating incompatible devices and decreases the need for experts during the configuration phase. In the second area, related to integration, the interoperable modeling format, Unified Robot Description Format (URDF), is investigated, where a detailed analysis is performed, revealing significant inconsistencies and critical improvements. This format is widely used for kinematic modeling and 3D visualization of robots, and its models can be reused across simulation tools. Improving this format benefits a wide range of users, including robotics engineers, researchers, and students. In the third area, related to deployment, Digital Twins (DTs) for robot systems are explored, as these improve efficiency and reduce downtime. A comprehensive literature review of DTs is conducted, and a case study of modular robot systems is developed. This research can accelerate the adoption of DTs in the robotics industry. These insights and approaches improve the process of robotic systems integration, offering valuable contributions that future research can build upon, ultimately driving efficiency, and reducing costs.

In many scenarios, configurators support the configuration of a solution that satisfies the preferences of a single user. The concept of \emph{multi-configuration} is based on the idea of configuring a set of configurations. Such a functionality is relevant in scenarios such as the configuration of personalized exams, the configuration of project teams, and the configuration of different trips for individual members of a tourist group (e.g., when visiting a specific city). In this paper, we exemplify the application of multi-configuration for generating individualized exams. We also provide a constraint solver performance analysis which helps to gain some insights into corresponding performance issues.