Teddington Conference

Group Report 34-75, Lincoln Laboratories, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,Lexington, Mass

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR the two volumes of papers and discussions of papers from the 1959 conference held at the National Physical Laboratory, sometimes known as "The Teddington Conference". Officially these two volumes are the Proceedings of the Symposium on Mechanisation of Thought Processes. Many of the classics are downloadable separately, the remainder are available from the longer downloads of the complete volumes:Vol 1 = http://aitopics.org/sites/default/files/classic/TeddingtonConference/Mechanisation of Thought Processes Vol. 1.pdfVol. 2 = http://aitopics.org/sites/default/files/classic/TeddingtonConference/Mechanisation of Thought Processes Vol. 2.pdfTeddington Conference

From: Technology Review, November, 62:42-45. See also: Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers, IBM Journal of Research and Development, 3(3) :210-229, 1959.

"MANY EFFORTS have been made to discriminate,  categorize, and quantitate patterns, and  to reduce them into a usable machine language.  The results have ordinarily been methods or devices  with a high degree of specificity. For example, some  devices require a special type font; others can read  only one type font; still others require magnetic ink. We have an interest in decision-making circuits  with the following qualities: (1) measurable high reliability  in decision making, (2) either a high or a low  reliability input, and (3) possibly low reliability components.  The high specificity of the devices and  methods mentioned above was felt to be a drawback  for our purposes. All of these approaches prove upon inspection to center upon analysis of the specific  characteristics of patterns into parts, followed by a  synthesis of the whole from the parts. In these  studies, pattern recognition of the whole, that is, Gestalt recognition, was chosen as a more fruitful  avenue of approach and as a satisfactory problem for  the initial phases of the over-all study." Proceedings of the Eastern Joint Computer Conference, pp. 225-232, New York: Association for Computing Machinery

Teddington Conference

In Proceedings of the Symposium on Mechanisation of Thought Processes, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, England, London: H. M. Stationary Office, pp. 3-36

The studies reported here have been concerned with the programming of a digital computer to behave in a way which, if done by human beings oranimals, would be described as involving the process of learning. Whilethis is not the place to dwell on the importance of machine-learning procedures,or to discourse on the philosophical aspects,1 there is obviously avery large amount of work, now done by people, which is quite trivial inits demands on the intellect but does, nevertheless, involve some learning.Also in Computers and Thought. Feigenbaum, Edward A. and Julian Feldman (Editors) 1963.See also:IEEE XploreSome Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers, II - Recent ProgressIBM Journal of Research and Development, 3:211-229

Teddington Conference

Biometrics is a scientific journal emphasizing the role of statistics and mathematics in the biological sciences. Its object is to promote and extend the use of mathematical and statistical methods in pure and applied biological sciences by describing developments in these methods and their applications in a form readily assimilable by experimental scientists. JSTOR provides a digital archive of the print version of Biometrics. Authorized users may be able to access the full text articles at this site.