University of Memphis
Special Track on Applied Natural Language Processing
Lintean, Mihai (University of Memphis) | Boonthum-Denecke, Chutima (Hampton University)
A Comparative Study on English and Chinese Word Uses with LIWC
Li, Haiying (University of Memphis) | Cai, Zhiqiang (University of Memphis) | Graesser, Arthur C. (University of Memphis) | Duan, Ying (University of Memphis)
This paper compared the linguistic and psychological word uses in English and Chinese languages with LIWC (Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count) programs. A Principal Component Analysis uncovered six linguistic and psychological components, among which five components were significantly correlated. The correlated components were ranked as Negative Valence (r=.92), Embodiment (r=.88), Narrative (r=.68), Achievement (r=.65), and Social Relation (r=.64). However, the results showed the order of the representative features differs in two languages and certain word categories co-occurred with different components in English and Chinese. The differences were interpreted from the perspective of distinctive eastern and western cultures.
Malleability of Students’ Perceptions of an Affect-Sensitive Tutor and Its Influence on Learning
D' (University of Notre Dame) | Mello, Sidney (University of Memphis) | Graesser, Art
We evaluated an affect-sensitive version of AutoTutor, a dialogue based ITS that simulates human tutors. While the original AutoTutor is sensitive to students’ cognitive states, the affect-sensitive tutor (Supportive tutor) also responds to students’ affective states (boredom, confusion, and frustration) with empathetic, encouraging, and motivational dialogue moves that are accompanied by appropriate emotional expressions. We conducted an experiment that compared the Supportive and Regular (non-affective) tutors over two 30-minute learning sessions with respect to perceived effectiveness, fidelity of cognitive and emotional feedback, engagement, and enjoyment. The results indicated that, irrespective of tutor, students’ ratings of engagement, enjoyment, and perceived learning decreased across sessions, but these ratings were not correlated with actual learning gains. In contrast, students’ perceptions of how closely the computer tutors resembled human tutors increased across learning sessions, was related to the quality of tutor feedback, the increase was greater for the Supportive tutor, and was a powerful predictor of learning. Implications of our findings for the design of affect-sensitive ITSs are discussed.
Syntagmatic, Paradigmatic, and Automatic N-Gram Approaches to Assessing Essay Quality
Crossley, Scott (Georgia State University) | Cai, Zhiqiang (University of Memphis) | McNamara, Danielle S. (Arizona State University)
Computational indices related to n-gram production were developed in order to assess the potential for n-gram indices to predict human scores of essay quality. A regression analyses was conducted on a corpus of 313 argumentative essays. The analyses demonstrated that a variety of n-gram indices were highly correlated to essay quality, but were also highly correlated to the number of words in the text (although many of the n-gram indices were stronger predictors of writing quality than the number of words in a text). A second regression analysis was conducted on a corpus of 88 argumentative essays that were controlled for text length differences. This analysis demonstrated that n-gram indices were still strong predictors of essay quality when text length was not a factor.
Interactive Concept Maps and Learning Outcomes in Guru
Person, Natalie K. (Rhodes College) | Olney, Andrew M. (University of Memphis) | D' (University of Notre Dame) | Mello, Sidney K. (University of Memphis) | Lehman, Blair A.
Concept maps are frequently used in K-12 educational settings. The purpose of this study is to determine whether students’ performance on interactive concept map tasks in Guru, an intelligent tutoring system, is related to immediate and delayed learning outcomes. Guru is a dialogue-based system for high-school biology that intersperses concept map tasks within the tutorial dialogue. Results indicated that when students first attempt to complete concept maps, time spent on the maps may be a good indicator of their understanding, whereas the errors they make on their second attempts with the maps may be an indicator of the knowledge they are lacking. This pattern of results was observed for one cycle of testing, but not replicated in a second cycle. Differences in the findings for the two testing cycles are most likely due to topic variations.
Reports of the AAAI 2011 Fall Symposia
Blisard, Sam (Naval Research Laboratory) | Carmichael, Ted (University of North Carolina at Charlotte) | Ding, Li (University of Maryland, Baltimore County) | Finin, Tim (University of Maryland, Baltimore County) | Frost, Wende (Naval Research Laboratory) | Graesser, Arthur (University of Memphis) | Hadzikadic, Mirsad (University of North Carolina at Charlotte) | Kagal, Lalana (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) | Kruijff, Geert-Jan M. (German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence) | Langley, Pat (Arizona State University) | Lester, James (North Carolina State University) | McGuinness, Deborah L. (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute) | Mostow, Jack (Carnegie Mellon University) | Papadakis, Panagiotis (University of Sapienza, Rome) | Pirri, Fiora (Sapienza University of Rome) | Prasad, Rashmi (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee) | Stoyanchev, Svetlana (Columbia University) | Varakantham, Pradeep (Singapore Management University)
The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence was pleased to present the 2011 Fall Symposium Series, held Friday through Sunday, November 4–6, at the Westin Arlington Gateway in Arlington, Virginia. The titles of the seven symposia are as follows: (1) Advances in Cognitive Systems; (2) Building Representations of Common Ground with Intelligent Agents; (3) Complex Adaptive Systems: Energy, Information and Intelligence; (4) Multiagent Coordination under Uncertainty; (5) Open Government Knowledge: AI Opportunities and Challenges; (6) Question Generation; and (7) Robot-Human Teamwork in Dynamic Adverse Environment. The highlights of each symposium are presented in this report.
Reports of the AAAI 2011 Fall Symposia
Blisard, Sam (Naval Research Laboratory) | Carmichael, Ted (University of North Carolina at Charlotte) | Ding, Li (University of Maryland, Baltimore County) | Finin, Tim (University of Maryland, Baltimore County) | Frost, Wende (Naval Research Laboratory) | Graesser, Arthur (University of Memphis) | Hadzikadic, Mirsad (University of North Carolina at Charlotte) | Kagal, Lalana (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) | Kruijff, Geert-Jan M. (German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence) | Langley, Pat (Arizona State University) | Lester, James (North Carolina State University) | McGuinness, Deborah L. (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute) | Mostow, Jack (Carnegie Mellon University) | Papadakis, Panagiotis (University of Sapienza, Rome) | Pirri, Fiora (Sapienza University of Rome) | Prasad, Rashmi (University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee) | Stoyanchev, Svetlana (Columbia University) | Varakantham, Pradeep (Singapore Management University)
The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence was pleased to present the 2011 Fall Symposium Series, held Friday through Sunday, November 4–6, at the Westin Arlington Gateway in Arlington, Virginia. The titles of the seven symposia are as follows: (1) Advances in Cognitive Systems; (2) Building Representations of Common Ground with Intelligent Agents; (3) Complex Adaptive Systems: Energy, Information and Intelligence; (4) Multiagent Coordination under Uncertainty; (5) Open Government Knowledge: AI Opportunities and Challenges; (6) Question Generation; and (7) Robot-Human Teamwork in Dynamic Adverse Environment. The highlights of each symposium are presented in this report.
Florida AI Research Society
McCarthy, Philip M. (University of Memphis) | Murray, Chas (Carnegie Learning)
Motivational Impacts of a Game-Based Intelligent Tutoring System
Jackson, G. Tanner (University of Memphis) | McNamara, Danielle (University of Memphis)
iSTART is an intelligent tutoring system (ITS) designed to improve students’ reading comprehension. Previous studies have indicated that iSTART is successful; however, these studies have also indicated that students benefit most from long-term interactions that can become tedious and boring. A new game-based version of the system has been developed, called iSTART-ME (motivationally enhanced). Initial results from a usability study with iSTART-ME indicate that this system increases engagement and decreases boredom over time.
FLAIRS Conference Committees
McCarthy, Philip M. (University of Memphis) | Murray, Chas (Carnegie Learning)