--This paper introduces OpenLS-DGF, an adaptive logic synthesis dataset generation framework, to enhance machine learning (ML) applications within the logic synthesis process. Previous dataset generation flows were tailored for specific tasks or lacked integrated machine learning capabilities. While OpenLS-DGF supports various machine learning tasks by encapsulating the three fundamental steps of logic synthesis: Boolean representation, logic optimization, and technology mapping. It preserves the original information in both V erilog and machine-learning-friendly GraphML formats. The verilog files offer semi-customizable capabilities, enabling researchers to insert additional steps and incrementally refine the generated dataset. Furthermore, OpenLS-DGF includes an adaptive circuit engine that facilitates the final dataset management and downstream tasks. The generated OpenLS-D-v1 dataset comprises 46 combinational designs from established benchmarks, totaling over 966,000 Boolean circuits. OpenLS-D-v1 supports integrating new data features, making it more versatile for new challenges. This paper demonstrates the versatility of OpenLS-D-v1 through four distinct downstream tasks: circuit classification, circuit ranking, quality of results (QoR) prediction, and probability prediction. Each task is chosen to represent essential steps of logic synthesis, and the experimental results show the generated dataset from OpenLS-DGF achieves prominent diversity and applicability. OGIC synthesis is a key phase in the electronic design automation (EDA) flow of digital circuits, translating high-level specifications into a gate-level netlist. Recently, there has been a trend towards adopting ML approaches for the EDA [1] domain. V arious machine learning methodologies have been proposed, demonstrating improvements in different aspects of the logic synthesis process, including logic optimization [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], technology mapping [7], [8], [9], and formal verification [10], [11]. These machine learning-based techniques have shown their promise in improving the efficiency and quality of logic synthesis steps.

Boolean circuit is a computational graph that consists of the dynamic directed graph structure and static functionality. The commonly used logic optimization and Boolean matching-based transformation can change the behavior of the Boolean circuit for its graph structure and functionality in logic synthesis. The graph structure-based Boolean circuit classification can be grouped into the graph classification task, however, the functionality-based Boolean circuit classification remains an open problem for further research. In this paper, we first define the proposed matching-equivalent class based on its ``Boolean-aware'' property. The Boolean circuits in the proposed class can be transformed into each other. Then, we present a commonly study framework based on graph neural network~(GNN) to analyze the key factors that can affect the Boolean-aware Boolean circuit classification. The empirical experiment results verify the proposed analysis, and it also shows the direction and opportunity to improve the proposed problem. The code and dataset will be released after acceptance.

Rewriting is a common procedure in logic synthesis aimed at improving the performance, power, and area (PPA) of circuits. The traditional reconvergence-driven And-Inverter Graph (AIG) rewriting method focuses solely on optimizing the reconvergence cone through Boolean algebra minimization. However, there exist opportunities to incorporate other node-rewriting algorithms that are better suited for specific cones. In this paper, we propose an adaptive reconvergence-driven AIG rewriting algorithm that combines two key techniques: multi-strategy-based AIG rewriting and strategy learning-based algorithm selection. The multi-strategy-based rewriting method expands upon the traditional approach by incorporating support for multi-node-rewriting algorithms, thus expanding the optimization space. Additionally, the strategy learning-based algorithm selection method determines the most suitable node-rewriting algorithm for a given cone. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method yields a significant average improvement of 5.567\% in size and 5.327\% in depth.