It is nowadays our responsibility to convince our contemporary citizens that AI devices as UGVs (Unmanned Ground Vehicles) and UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) are crucial actors of today’s life in a dual domains, both civilian and military. In particular, the decision process is the main component of every military operation and is of high interest because of two main reasons : it is necessary designed to cope with conflict issues and it requires a very complex planning process to be successful. The difficulty to find a good plan is worse in urban areas because of the high uncertainty due to the topology of these areas, the presence of civilians, who can be hostile or friendly, and the unpredictable nature of enemies. The idea in that paper is to qualify what can be a valid computed plan in that context , i.e. welldesigned for recovering of peace, rescue operations after a bombing event, hostage salvage, non-combatant evacuation operations, civil-military co-operation, ...., in urban areas. This planning process leads to associate actually four components, the representation of the tactical scheme, the implementation of the tactical scheme as the behaviour of special forces, military units or emergency squads, the proof process or the explanation process, and finally the handling of external factors depending on the current environment or the current context in which the operation takes place. This paper uses a quaternary representation called the epistemological quadriptych, in order to highlight that the integration of UGVs or UAVs devices requires actually to understand the role of knowledge and behaviour and to provide secure and valid action plans, i.e. which can be explained and justified.

The aim of this paper is to define a both pragmatic and formal method allowing a social or technical entity to define its own strategic goals and plans. Indeed, by definition, an autonomous entity ought to be governed only by its own principles and laws. Thus, the core concept of autonomy is the capability of defining this principles regarding its own objectives and plans. Thus, the robustness of any autonomous system relies on the pivotal concept of Self-Orientation. This paper focuses on the first formal steps of Self-Orientation theories for any group of agents.

Hybrid group autonomy, organizations and teams composed of humans, machines and robots, are important to AI. Unlike the war in Iraq in 2002, the war in Afghanistan has hundreds of mobile robots aloft, on land, or under the sea. But when it comes to solving problems as part of a team, these agents are socially passive. Were the problem of aggregation and the autonomy of hybrids to be solved, robot teams could accompa- ny humans to address and solve problems together on Mars, under the sea, or in dan- gerous locations on earth (such as, fire-fighting, reactor meltdowns, and future wars). “Robot autonomy is required because one soldier cannot control several robots ... [and] because no computational system can discriminate between combatants and innocents in a close-contact encounter.” (Sharkey, 2008) Yet, today, one of the fundamental unsolved problems in the social sciences is the aggregation of individual data (such as preferences) into group (team) data (Giles, 2011) The original motivation behind game theory was to study the effect that multi- ple agents have on each other (Von Neumann and Morgenstern, 1953), known as interdependence or mutual dependence. Essentially, the challenge addresses the ques- tion: why is a group different from the collection of individuals who comprise the group? That the problem remains unsolved almost 70 years later is a remarkable com- ment on the state of the social sciences today, including game theory and economics. But solving this challenge is essential for the science and engineering of multiagent, multirobot and hybrid environments (that is, humans, machines and robots working together).

The AAAI-99 Workshop Program (a part of the sixteenth national conference on artificial intelligence) was held in Orlando, Florida. Each workshop was limited to approximately 25 to 50 participants. Participation was by invitation from the workshop organizers. The workshops were Agent-Based Systems in the Business Context, Agents' Conflicts, Artificial Intelligence for Distributed Information Networking, Artificial Intelligence for Electronic Commerce, Computation with Neural Systems Workshop, Configuration, Data Mining with Evolutionary Algorithms: Research Directions (Jointly sponsored by GECCO-99), Environmental Decision Support Systems and Artificial Intelligence, Exploring Synergies of Knowledge Management and Case-Based Reasoning, Intelligent Information Systems, Intelligent Software Engineering, Machine Learning for Information Extraction, Mixed-Initiative Intelligence, Negotiation: Settling Conflicts and Identifying Opportunities, Ontology Management, and Reasoning in Context for AI Applications.

The AAAI-99 Workshop Program (a part of the sixteenth national conference on artificial intelligence) was held in Orlando, Florida. The program included 16 workshops covering a wide range of topics in AI. Each workshop was limited to approximately 25 to 50 participants. Participation was by invitation from the workshop organizers. The workshops were Agent-Based Systems in the Business Context, Agents' Conflicts, Artificial Intelligence for Distributed Information Networking, Artificial Intelligence for Electronic Commerce, Computation with Neural Systems Workshop, Configuration, Data Mining with Evolutionary Algorithms: Research Directions (Jointly sponsored by GECCO-99), Environmental Decision Support Systems and Artificial Intelligence, Exploring Synergies of Knowledge Management and Case-Based Reasoning, Intelligent Information Systems, Intelligent Software Engineering, Machine Learning for Information Extraction, Mixed-Initiative Intelligence, Negotiation: Settling Conflicts and Identifying Opportunities, Ontology Management, and Reasoning in Context for AI Applications.