The recently introduced TabPFN pretrains an In-Context Learning (ICL) transformer on synthetic data to perform tabular data classification. As synthetic data does not share features or labels with real-world data, the underlying mechanism that contributes to the success of this method remains unclear. This study provides an explanation by demonstrating that ICL-transformers acquire the ability to create complex decision boundaries during pretraining. To validate our claim, we develop a novel forest dataset generator which creates datasets that are unrealistic, but have complex decision boundaries. Our experiments confirm the effectiveness of ICL-transformers pretrained on this data. Furthermore, we create TabForestPFN, the ICL-transformer pretrained on both the original TabPFN synthetic dataset generator and our forest dataset generator. By fine-tuning this model, we reach the current state-of-the-art on tabular data classification.

While interests in tabular deep learning has significantly grown, conventional tree-based models still outperform deep learning methods. To narrow this performance gap, we explore the innovative retrieval mechanism, a methodology that allows neural networks to refer to other data points while making predictions. Our experiments reveal that retrieval-based training, especially when fine-tuning the pretrained TabPFN model, notably surpasses existing methods. Moreover, the extensive pretraining plays a crucial role to enhance the performance of the model. These insights imply that blending the retrieval mechanism with pretraining and transfer learning schemes offers considerable potential for advancing the field of tabular deep learning.

This survey focuses on categorizing and evaluating the methods of supernet optimization in the field of Neural Architecture Search (NAS). Supernet optimization involves training a single, over-parameterized network that encompasses the search space of all possible network architectures. The survey analyses supernet optimization methods based on their approaches to spatial and temporal optimization. Spatial optimization relates to optimizing the architecture and parameters of the supernet and its subnets, while temporal optimization deals with improving the efficiency of selecting architectures from the supernet. The benefits, limitations, and potential applications of these methods in various tasks and settings, including transferability, domain generalization, and Transformer models, are also discussed.