Elon Musk owning OpenAI would be a terrible idea. That doesn't mean it won't happen Chris Stokel-Walker

The two had a blowout argument over the future direction of OpenAI – the company they came together to found in 2015 – with Altman seemingly content to pursue a for-profit approach and Musk feeling that was forswearing the founding principles of the firm as well as its name. OpenAI couldn't be open, he reckoned, if it was closed off and trying to make money rather than better humanity. So it's no surprise that Musk, who lodged an audacious bid to take over Twitter a little more than two years ago, which ended up with his ownership of the platform now called X, has sought to put a spoiler in two years of near-untrammelled growth for OpenAI. Musk – who is currently overhauling (to his supporters; "tearing down" to his opponents) the US government to be, as he would describe it, leaner and more efficient while also devastating important programmes such as international aid and cutting-edge scientific research – has lodged a near 100bn bid for OpenAI's non-profit arm. "It's time for OpenAI to return to the open-source, safety-focused force for good it once was," Musk said in a statement supplied by the lawyer shepherding his bid.