Supreme Court rejects challenge to Google book-scanning project

Fair use also allows for people to transform the original content into a new type of work, and that transformation of the printed books was part of Google's argument in this case. The group wanted the Supreme Court to "recognize Google's seizure of property as a serious threat to writers and their livelihoods, one which will affect the depth, resilience, and vitality of our intellectual culture," the Authors Guild said on a webpage detailing the case. The Supreme Court decision gave authors a "colossal loss," Authors Guild President Roxana Robinson said in a statement. Google Books project may lead to a short-term public benefit, but it will come at the expense of the future vitality of U.S. culture, Robinson added. "The denial of review is further proof that we're witnessing a vast redistribution of wealth from the creative sector to the tech sector, not only with books, but across the spectrum of the arts," she said.