Nate Silver savages media study claiming harsher treatment of Biden compared to Trump: 'Complete crap'

In media news today, CNN and Chris Cuomo issue scathing statements against each other, the former anchor announces he's leaving his SiriusXM radio show, and a New York Times op-ed gets mocked for fearing free library is contributing to gentrification. Pollster Nate Silver on Monday savaged the analytics behind a recent Washington Post column claiming President Biden was being treated just as badly, or worse, by the media than former President Trump. In the piece published last week, liberal columnist Dana Milbank complained about Biden's media coverage being overly tough and implored journalists to do "soul-searching" and "think about what it is we're delivering to people." In a series of tweets, Silver argued the piece's "sentiment analysis" measuring the positivity and negativity of particular articles written about Trump and Biden was "complete crap," and gave examples to show how the data could be skewed more positively or negatively than it should have been. "To this good thread explaining why the'sentiment analysis' cited in the [Dana Milbank] WaPo article this weekend is complete crap--the analysis was used to make the claim that the press is just negative toward Biden as Trump--I'll also add a couple of comments based on their data," Silver wrote.