Comparative Analysis of AI Planning Systems: A Report on the AAAI Workshop

Kambhampati presented theoretical planning systems is difficult. Although national AI conference, was lively It was noted that comparing planners encoding expert knowledge is at the and interesting. Both the theoretical is similar in difficulty to comparing heart of HTN planning, there and practical sides of the AI planning programming languages (in fact, the remains a considerable gap to bridge community were represented, input specifications to a planner can in using expert planning knowledge and both sides seemed to understand be viewed as a programming language). Shlomo Zilberstein (University Third, it was generally acknowledged Several papers contributed further of Massachusetts) presented a that common plan representations to the theoretical analysis of number of evaluation measures. A algorithms or through empirical An integrated system that executes common representation would allow studies (Christer Backstrom, or uses the generated plans formal comparisons among widely Linkoping University, Sweden; Subbarao should be evaluated instead of simply different planning technologies.