Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation

These software between telephone, television, agents are on their way, and they're going to The be getting a lot of things accomplished by basic idea is that the networks that constitute interacting with each other. The question is, our telephone infrastructure, our television How will these agents be cooperating with (particularly cable) infrastructure, and our each other, competing with each other, and computer infrastructure will be coalescing into negotiating with each other? Now, the agents that we are interested in Another example is routing among looking at are heterogeneous, self-motivated telecommunication networks. The systems are not assumed to be packets, can pass over a network controlled by centrally designed. For example, if you have a one company onto another network controlled personal digital assistant, you might have one by another company, or it can pass that was built by IBM, but the next person through one country on through another. Computers that control a telecommunications They don't necessarily have a notion of global network might find it beneficial to enter into utility. Each personal digital assistant or agreements with other computers that control each agent operating from your machine is other networks about routing packets more interested in what your idea of utility is and efficiently from source to destination. The in how to further your notion of goodness. We're other agents ask them to do unless they have Another example is the proliferation of shared databases, where there's information They have sprung up with a vengeance in the last decade.