When and Why Are Deep Networks Better Than Shallow Ones?

Mhaskar, Hrushikesh (California Institute of Technology) | Liao, Qianli (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) | Poggio, Tomaso (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

AAAI Conferences 

While the universal approximation property holds both for hierarchical and shallow networks, deep networks can approximate the class of compositional functions as well as shallow networks but with exponentially lower number of training parameters and sample complexity. Compositional functions are obtained as a hierarchy of local constituent functions, where "local functions'' are functions with low dimensionality. This theorem proves an old conjecture by Bengio on the role of depth in networks, characterizing precisely the conditions under which it holds. It also suggests possible answers to the the puzzle of why high-dimensional deep networks trained on large training sets often do not seem to show overfit.

Duplicate Docs Excel Report

Title
None found

Similar Docs  Excel Report  more

TitleSimilaritySource
None found