Social Attitudes of AI Rebellion: A Framework
Coman, Alexandra (National Research Council/Naval Research Laboratory) | Johnson, Benjamin (National Research Council/Naval Research Laboratory) | Briggs, Gordon (National Research Council/Naval Research Laboratory) | Aha, David W. (Naval Research Laboratory)
Human attitudes of objection, protest, and rebellion have undeniable potential to bring about social benefits, from social justice to healthy balance in relationships. At times, they can even be argued to be ethically obligatory. Conversely, AI rebellion is largely seen as a dangerous, destructive prospect. With the increase of interest in collaborative human/AI environments in which synthetic agents play social roles or, at least, exhibit behavior with social and ethical implications, we believe that AI rebellion could have benefits similar to those of its counterpart in humans. We introduce a framework meant to help categorize and design Rebel Agents, discuss their social and ethical implications, and assess their potential benefits and the risks they may pose. We also present AI rebellion scenarios in two considerably different contexts (military unmanned vehicles and computational social creativity) that exemplify components of the framework.
Feb-4-2017
- Country:
- North America > United States > Maryland (0.14)
- Industry:
- Leisure & Entertainment > Games
- Computer Games (0.34)
- Media > Music (0.67)
- Leisure & Entertainment > Games
- Technology:
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence
- Cognitive Science (1.00)
- Issues > Social & Ethical Issues (1.00)
- Representation & Reasoning > Agents (1.00)
- Robots (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence