Fairness through Optimization
Chen, Violet Xinying, Hooker, J. N.
–arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
We propose optimization as a general paradigm for formalizing fairness in AI-based decision models. We argue that optimization models allow formulation of a wide range of fairness criteria as social welfare functions, while enabling AI to take advantage of highly advanced solution technology. We show how optimization models can assist fairness-oriented decision making in the context of neural networks, support vector machines, and rule-based systems by maximizing a social welfare function subject to appropriate constraints. In particular, we state tractable optimization models for a variety of functions that measure fairness or a combination of fairness and efficiency. These include several inequality metrics, Rawlsian criteria, the McLoone and Hoover indices, alpha fairness, the Nash and Kalai-Smorodinsky bargaining solutions, combinations of Rawlsian and utilitarian criteria, and statistical bias measures. All of these models can be efficiently solved by linear programming, mixed integer/linear programming, or (in two cases) specialized convex programming methods.
arXiv.org Artificial Intelligence
Feb-1-2021
- Country:
- North America > United States
- Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom
- England
- Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- Bristol (0.04)
- England
- North America > United States
- Genre:
- Research Report (0.50)