Geometry of Program Synthesis

When we say the code on the description tape of the physical UTM "is" We re-evaluate universal computation based on w what we actually mean is, adopting the thermodynamic the synthesis of Turing machines. This leads to a language, that the system is in a phase (a local minima of view of programs as singularities of analytic varieties the free energy) including the microstate c we associate to or, equivalently, as phases of the Bayesian w. However, when the system is in this phase its microstate posterior of a synthesis problem. This new point is not equal to c but rather undergoes rapid spontaneous of view reveals unexplored directions of research transitions between many microstates "near" c. in program synthesis, of which neural networks are a subset, for example in relation to phase transitions, So in any possible physical realisation of a UTM, a program complexity and generalisation. We also is realised by a phase of the physical system. Does this have lay the empirical foundations for these new directions any computational significance?