Adaptive Conformal Prediction via Bayesian Uncertainty Weighting for Hierarchical Healthcare Data
Shahbazi, Marzieh Amiri, Baheri, Ali, Azadeh-Fard, Nasibeh
Clinical decision-making demands uncertainty quantification that provides both distribution-free coverage guarantees and risk-adaptive precision, requirements that existing methods fail to jointly satisfy. We present a hybrid Bayesian-conformal framework that addresses this fundamental limitation in healthcare predictions. Our approach integrates Bayesian hierarchical random forests with group-aware con-formal calibration, using posterior uncertainties to weight conformity scores while maintaining rigorous coverage validity. Evaluated on 61,538 admissions across 3,793 U.S. hospitals and 4 regions, our method achieves target coverage (94.3% vs 95% target) with adaptive precision: 21% narrower intervals for low-uncertainty cases while appropriately widening for high-risk predictions. Critically, we demonstrate that well-calibrated Bayesian uncertainties alone severely under-cover (14.1%), highlighting the necessity of our hybrid approach. This framework enables risk-stratified clinical protocols, efficient resource planning for high-confidence predictions, and conservative allocation with enhanced oversight for uncertain cases, providing uncertainty-aware decision support across diverse healthcare settings.
Jan-6-2026
- Country:
- North America
- Canada > Quebec
- Montreal (0.04)
- United States > New York
- Monroe County > Rochester (0.04)
- Canada > Quebec
- North America
- Genre:
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Industry: