ML-based Fault Injection for Autonomous Vehicles: A Case for Bayesian Fault Injection

Jha, Saurabh, Banerjee, Subho S., Tsai, Timothy, Hari, Siva K. S., Sullivan, Michael B., Kalbarczyk, Zbigniew T., Keckler, Stephen W., Iyer, Ravishankar K.

arXiv.org Machine Learning 

Items (a), (b), and (c) are integrated into a intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to integrate Bayesian network (BN). BNs provide a favorable formalism mechanical, electronic, and computing technologies to make in which to model the propagation of faults across AV system real-time driving decisions. AI enables AVs to navigate through components with an interpretable model. The model, together complex environments while maintaining a safety envelope [1], with fault injection results, can be used to design and assess [2] that is continuously measured and quantified by onboard the safety of AVs. Further, BNs enable rapid probabilistic sensors (e.g., camera, LiDAR, RADAR) [3]-[5]. Clearly, the inference, which allows DriveFI to quickly find safety-critical safety and resilience of AVs are of significant concern, as faults. The Bayesian FI framework can be extended to other exemplified by several headline-making AV crashes [6], [7], safety-critical systems (e.g., surgical robots). The framework as well as prior work characterizing AV resilience during road requires specification of the safety constraints and the system tests [8]. Hence there is a compelling need for a comprehensive software architecture to model causal relationship between assessment of AV technology.

Duplicate Docs Excel Report

Title
None found

Similar Docs  Excel Report  more

TitleSimilaritySource
None found