AutoGen Driven Multi Agent Framework for Iterative Crime Data Analysis and Prediction

Figure 4: P lot over 100 epochs with 3 - Agents F. Ablation Study - Impact of the LearningOptimizerAgent To quantify the OptimizerAgent's effect on the system, we conducted an ablation study that set up two different configurations. Baseline (3 - Agent Framework): CrimeAnalysisAssistant, FeedbackAgent, and CrimePredictorAgent. Extended (4 - Agent Framework): All of the above, with the OptimizerAgent that could oversee and control how the other agents worked. Both settings were tested using the same protocol, working with the same data for 100 epochs and evaluated according to the already mentioned metrics described in Section V - B. Importantly, during the extended framework tests the OptimizerAgent did not have access to the ground truth and its actions reflected those of a real - world supervisor trying to be efficient with resources . The main aim was to bring more stability and better learning curve using our framework LUCID - MA. Table 2: 4 - Aegnts Observed Improvement Metric Baseline (3 agents) With OptimizerAgent Improvement CrimeAnalysis Assistant Final Score 0.94 0.96 +0.02 FeedbackAgent Final Score 0.89 0.92 +0.03 CrimePredictorAgent Final Score 0.85 0.91 +0.06 Avg. Redundancy Across Epochs 14.2% 6.8% - 7.4% Using the OptimizerAgent resulted in a marked increase in the variety and quality of final system outputs . Visual Result: The final plot demonstrates that agent - level meta - control, As a result, the model exhibits higher consistency, greater variety in its results and more reliable improvement over time -- all accomplished without any need for further model fine - tuning. Figure 5: P lot over 100 epochs with 4 - Agents In addition to standard performance comparison metrics, our system portrayed advanced behavioral dynamics pointing to the pre sence of emergent intelligence capabilities which we delve into in the next section in great detail.