Credit scoring models based on accepted applications may be biased and their consequences can have a statistical and economic impact. Reject inference is the process of attempting to infer the creditworthiness status of the rejected applications. In this research, we use deep generative models to develop two new semi-supervised Bayesian models for reject inference in credit scoring, in which we model the data generating process to be dependent on a Gaussian mixture. The goal is to improve the classification accuracy in credit scoring models by adding reject applications. Our proposed models infer the unknown creditworthiness of the rejected applications by exact enumeration of the two possible outcomes of the loan (default or non-default). The efficient stochastic gradient optimization technique used in deep generative models makes our models suitable for large data sets. Finally, the experiments in this research show that our proposed models perform better than classical and alternative machine learning models for reject inference in credit scoring.

Nanowire field-effect sensors have recently been developed for label-free detection of biomolecules. In this work, we introduce a computational technique based on Bayesian estimation to determine the physical parameters of the sensor and, more importantly, the properties of the analyte molecules. To that end, we first propose a PDE based model to simulate the device charge transport and electrochemical behavior. Then, the adaptive Metropolis algorithm with delayed rejection (DRAM) is applied to estimate the posterior distribution of unknown parameters, namely molecule charge density, molecule density, doping concentration, and electron and hole mobilities. We determine the device and molecules properties simultaneously, and we also calculate the molecule density as the only parameter after having determined the device parameters. This approach makes it possible not only to determine unknown parameters, but it also shows how well each parameter can be determined by yielding the probability density function (pdf).

The existing approaches to intrinsic dimension estimation usually are not reliable when the data are nonlinearly embedded in the high dimensional space. In this work, we show that the explicit accounting to geometric properties of unknown support leads to the polynomial correction to the standard maximum likelihood estimate of intrinsic dimension for flat manifolds. The proposed algorithm (GeoMLE) realizes the correction by regression of standard MLEs based on distances to nearest neighbors for different sizes of neighborhoods. Moreover, the proposed approach also efficiently handles the case of nonuniform sampling of the manifold. We perform numerous experiments on different synthetic and real-world datasets. The results show that our algorithm achieves state-of-the-art performance, while also being computationally efficient and robust to noise in the data.

We propose a supervised anomaly detection method based on neural density estimators, where the negative log likelihood is used for the anomaly score. Density estimators have been widely used for unsupervised anomaly detection. By the recent advance of deep learning, the density estimation performance has been greatly improved. However, the neural density estimators cannot exploit anomaly label information, which would be valuable for improving the anomaly detection performance. The proposed method effectively utilizes the anomaly label information by training the neural density estimator so that the likelihood of normal instances is maximized and the likelihood of anomalous instances is lower than that of the normal instances. We employ an autoregressive model for the neural density estimator, which enables us to calculate the likelihood exactly. With the experiments using 16 datasets, we demonstrate that the proposed method improves the anomaly detection performance with a few labeled anomalous instances, and achieves better performance than existing unsupervised and supervised anomaly detection methods.

Variational Bayes (VB) methods have emerged as a fast and computationally-efficient alternative to Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods for Bayesian estimation of mixed multinomial logit (MMNL) models. It has been established that VB is substantially faster than MCMC at practically no compromises in predictive accuracy. In this paper, we address two critical gaps concerning the usage and understanding of VB for MMNL. First, extant VB methods are limited to utility specifications involving only individual-specific taste parameters. Second, the finite-sample properties of VB estimators and the relative performance of VB, MCMC and maximum simulated likelihood estimation (MSLE) are not known. To address the former, this study extends several VB methods for MMNL to admit utility specifications including both fixed and random utility parameters. To address the latter, we conduct an extensive simulation-based evaluation to benchmark the extended VB methods against MCMC and MSLE in terms of estimation times, parameter recovery and predictive accuracy. The results suggest that all VB variants perform as well as MCMC and MSLE at prediction and recovery of all model parameters with the exception of the covariance matrix of the multivariate normal mixing distribution. In particular, VB with nonconjugate variational message passing and the delta-method (VB-NCVMP-Delta) is relatively accurate and up to 15 times faster than MCMC and MSLE. On the whole, VB-NCVMP-Delta is most suitable for applications in which fast predictions are paramount, while MCMC should be preferred in applications in which accurate inferences are most important.

We describe an expressive class of policies that can be efficiently learned from a few demonstrations. Policies are represented as logical combinations of programs drawn from a small domain-specific language (DSL). We define a prior over policies with a probabilistic grammar and derive an approximate Bayesian inference algorithm to learn policies from demonstrations. In experiments, we study five strategy games played on a 2D grid with one shared DSL. After a few demonstrations of each game, the inferred policies generalize to new game instances that differ substantially from the demonstrations. We argue that the proposed method is an apt choice for policy learning tasks that have scarce training data and feature significant, structured variation between task instances.

Neural density estimators are flexible families of parametric models which have seen widespread use in unsupervised machine learning in recent years. Maximum-likelihood training typically dictates that these models be constrained to specify an explicit density. However, this limitation can be overcome by instead using a neural network to specify an energy function, or unnormalized density, which can subsequently be normalized to obtain a valid distribution. The challenge with this approach lies in accurately estimating the normalizing constant of the high-dimensional energy function. We propose the Autoregressive Energy Machine, an energy-based model which simultaneously learns an unnormalized density and computes an importance-sampling estimate of the normalizing constant for each conditional in an autoregressive decomposition. The Autoregressive Energy Machine achieves state-of-the-art performance on a suite of density-estimation tasks.

Here we consider, in the context of causal inference, the basic question: 'what can be estimated from data?'. We call this the question of estimability. We consider the usual definition adopted in the causal inference literature -- identifiability -- in a general mathematical setting and show why it is an inadequate formal translation of the concept of estimability. Despite showing that identifiability implies the existence of a Fisher-consistent estimator, we show that this estimator may be discontinuous, and hence unstable, in general. The difficulty arises because the causal inference problem is in general an ill-posed inverse problem. Inverse problems have three conditions which must be satisfied in order to be considered well-posed: existence, uniqueness, and stability of solutions. We illustrate how identifiability corresponds to the question of uniqueness; in contrast, we take estimability to mean satisfaction of all three conditions, i.e. well-posedness. It follows that mere identifiability does not guarantee well-posedness of a causal inference procedure, i.e. estimability, and apparent solutions to causal inference problems can be essentially useless with even the smallest amount of imperfection. These concerns apply, in particular, to causal inference approaches that focus on identifiability while ignoring the additional stability requirements needed for estimability.

In particular, There is a nexus of concepts at the heart of a rich interplay machine learning techniques have been used for between physics, statistics, machine learning, and variational optimization of ground state energy for quantum information theory. Concepts such as entropy that were systems [6]. Additionally, there have been a number key to the early work in thermodynamics are the bedrock of important developments that extend statistical inference of information theory. Similarly the Gibbs (or Boltzman) to domains where probabilistic modeling was previously distribution, which characterize the distribution of states inaccessible. These techniques have recently been in thermal equilibrium, is at the heart of energy based explored to solve statistical mechanics of classical systems models and Boltzman machines that were widely studied [7, 8]. In this work, we aim to connect recent developments in machine learning [1, 2]. Additionally, the study of in deep generative models [9-12], unsupervised complicated many-body systems gave rise to mean-field learning for implicit models [13], and variational inference methods and renormalization group methods.

The quest of `can machines think' and `can machines do what human do' are quests that drive the development of artificial intelligence. Although recent artificial intelligence succeeds in many data intensive applications, it still lacks the ability of learning from limited exemplars and fast generalizing to new tasks. To tackle this problem, one has to turn to machine learning, which supports the scientific study of artificial intelligence. Particularly, a machine learning problem called Few-Shot Learning (FSL) targets at this case. It can rapidly generalize to new tasks of limited supervised experience by turning to prior knowledge, which mimics human's ability to acquire knowledge from few examples through generalization and analogy. It has been seen as a test-bed for real artificial intelligence, a way to reduce laborious data gathering and computationally costly training, and antidote for rare cases learning. With extensive works on FSL emerging, we give a comprehensive survey for it. We first give the formal definition for FSL. Then we point out the core issues of FSL, which turns the problem from "how to solve FSL" to "how to deal with the core issues". Accordingly, existing works from the birth of FSL to the most recent published ones are categorized in a unified taxonomy, with thorough discussion of the pros and cons for different categories. Finally, we envision possible future directions for FSL in terms of problem setup, techniques, applications and theory, hoping to provide insights to both beginners and experienced researchers.